Currently, Autodesk Construction Cloud does not allow users to crop or snip content within the PDF viewer. If a user wants to highlight a specific portion of a drawing, they must use an external tool to capture the area and then upload it as a separate attachment—not as an overlay on the PDF. This creates several challenges: Workflow Disruption: Switching between ACC and external apps slows down reviews. Loss of Context: Uploaded images are detached from the PDF and do not appear in exports. Inefficient Communication: Teams cannot quickly isolate and share critical details without extra steps. Proposed Solution A built-in snip tool would allow users to drag-select any area of a sheet or document, crop it, and embed it directly into the markup layer. This would streamline the user experience, eliminate external dependencies, and improve clarity in communication and issue resolution. Show More

When Payment Application is rejected during the approval workflow, we suggested that the status of Payment Application will be changed to ‘Submitted’ rather than ‘Revise and Resubmit’.    If the user click 'Submitted' button, the claimed Work Completed would take the Work Completed amount which is inaccurate. The Claimed Work Completed should remain as the supplier’s first submission. The submitted status should remain the Claimed Work Completed original amount and allow the user to edit the Work Completed amount instead. Show More

Description: This could be considered a feature for both Revit and ACC/BIM 360 so I decided to post in both forums. Since ACC/BIM 360 currently does not have an automatic audit function, we would like the ability to automatically run audits by setting a day of the week and time—similar to a publish schedule—for models that are collaborated in ACC/BIM 360. Current Situation: Because audits can only be run when opening a project file, modelers experience waiting time when they start work in the morning. In projects where multiple people are working simultaneously, one person must complete the audit and synchronize the model before others are able to open the file. Request: We would like audits to run automatically by setting a day of the week and time, similar to the publish schedule feature in ACC/BIM 360. Optional: Also, although this feature does not currently exist in Revit, it would be preferable for audits to generate warnings and reports when errors are detected during the audit process. Proposed Implementation: Allow audit schedules to be set for files within the Team folder, in the same way that publish schedules are configured in BIM 360. Reference: This was originally posted to Revit Ideas (Japanese). As this is an important request from Japanese Revit users and was evaluated by the Revit User Group in 2025, it is being reposted here. https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-aidia-ri-ben-yuforamu/jian-zhano-zi-dong-hua/idi-p/11886812 Show More

The drawing file name is often truncated. We use ISO standard numbering, yet the file name is always truncated, with an eclipse at the end. This is incredibly frustrating, especially as there is plenty of blank white space to the right that could be utilised to display the full name, and then only truncate if the drawing title clashes with something else (such as the page selector on a multi page PDF). Show More

I'd like to see improvements to ACC's markup functionality, but since I currently rely on Goodnotes for markup, I'd like to see better integration between Goodnotes and ACC Docs in the iPad app. Specifically, I'd like to be able to import PDF files directly from ACC Docs to Goodnotes, and save PDF files directly from Goodnote to ACC Docs. Again, this is a request on the iPad. Show More

We request the implementation of a direct PDF export functionality within the "Comments in Review" report. The current Excel format presents configuration issues (layout, line breaks), requiring a manual and doubled effort to reformat the document and subsequently convert it to PDF. Including the PDF option will streamline the process and ensure the integrity of the report's layout. Show More

While testing NFC integration for asset tracking, it became clear that exposed Asset "B3F IDs" can be effortlessly cloned. This loophole compromises data integrity and security, allowing unauthorized access or replication of asset information.   Why this matters: If Asset "B3F IDs" remain visible or unencrypted, anyone can duplicate tags—undermining reliability and trust in the entire asset management process.   Suggested improvement/Proposed enhancement:  Introduce a “View only” permission option for Assets, alongside the current “View + export” level, so project admins can let users see assets in ACC without allowing CSV/Excel exports that expose sensitive "B3F IDs" used in NFC implementations   @tushar_nath @ameerul.rafei @farid_anuar @irham.hameeda @MAfiq_Yusoff      Show More

Hello,  There are several areas for improvement regarding the BCF export in ACC : ACC doesn't export custom parameters ACC doesn't export "Assign to" field ACC does not export the issue’s exact location (pinpoint). Instead, it only exports the camera position, which is completely different. In addition, the camera position is exported using the internal coordinate system rather than the shared coordinate system. As a result, the BCF file becomes incompatible with other software and important location information is missing.   Thanks again to the entire dev team for your support and hard work! Show More

Automation is the need of the hour. We have implemented Bot services for monitoring some of the mundane tasks. The introduction of Captcha recognition and 2 step verification is becoming a hindrance to successfully implement the same. Requesting to remove it for our account or provide us with an option to enable and disable at our convenience  Show More

A very very common request I get with Building Connected is to allow team members to be added to projects in a Read Only capacity meaning they would be able to see the information in Building Connected without being able to make any edits. For example, this would allow the preconstruction team to allow members of the ops team (PMs, superintendents, etc.) to review subcontractor information on Building Connected without the risk of inadvertent edits being made to the Building Connect page. You could even allow customers to view the Building Connected page in read-only mode in an open-book/GMP scenario.   I've confirmed with ACC/Building Connected customer support that this is not a current feature.    This would allow us to share information without using PDF/Excel exports that immediately become outdated as soon as new information becomes available on BC; ergo, enabling a single source of truth (basically ACCs primary mission) Show More

When completing a review we are given the option to notify additional team members at the end, however, there is no historic collection of who it got shared with. If we ever needed to prove a Review was shared with someone, there is no way to find out this information. When exporting the closed review as an excel, I can see the message that was typed up when shared with the additional members, but there is no list or trace of who it was sent to. Could this please be addressed as soon as possible and included in the review history? For traceability and transparency we need to be able to demonstrate who each review was shared with. Show More

Add a system field to RFIs that captures the date and time the RFI is opened (sent to the reviewer). This field would clearly reflect when the RFI is officially transferred into the reviewer’s responsibility, improving transparency, reporting accuracy, and response-time tracking. Show More

Please enable the ability to configure Section Assignees in Autodesk Build Form Templates at both the Account Library level and within Project Templates. Today, Section Assignees can only be set inside an active project, after the form has already been deployed AND copied, which prevents standardized, centralized setup.   Current Limitation Section Assignees are not available when creating or editing a form in the Account Library Section Assignees do not carry through Project Templates Project Admins must manually turn on Section Assignees in every project This results in inconsistent forms across teams and an added administrative burden   Why This Matters Organizations managing multiple projects expect form templates to deploy with a consistent structure and consistent role-based responsibilities. Without Section Assignees in Library or Project Template mode, form template behavior varies from project to project, increasing setup time and the risk of missed reviews or incomplete workflows.   Requested Enhancement Add support for: Assigning roles, companies, or members to each form template section directly in the Account Library Saving those assignments as part of the form template Deploying form templates into projects with Section Assignees already in place Optionally updating Section Assignees across existing projects when a form templates are updated Impact Ensures consistent review and handoff workflows across all projects Reduces repetitive manual configuration Allows true centralization of form template management Improves compliance and quality control for enterprise customers Show More

At the University of Florida, we have a need to track custom attribute data at the project level. This data would be helpful for inclusion on project dashboards and account-level dashboards.   I kindly suggest that Autodesk allow users to create custom attributes that can be managed by project administrators through the Project Settings page and via the API. It would be especially helpful if these custom attributes could be created on the project templates.   Show More

Having sa forms with Review ON, the reviwer will get  an email notification but no internal "alert" unde Build -> Home page. This is critical, since the review is waiting for a member and no internal warning / notification. \ I sigges to ad dit to "Projectsigned work"  or under My Home - > Assigned to me Show More

While Mobile App is really useful for the field users, some times it is also being misused.  i.e. A user who is not physically present at site, is performing safety check / Asking PTW from a remote location. ??? !!!! This is unacceptable.   We look for Geo Fencing of users tied up to project location which is very common in HR Attendance systems.  Show More

Scenario: Currently, sub-items cannot be added to SOV items once they have been partially claimed. One of our project teams often needs to introduce additional sub-items or further breakdowns even after partial claims have been submitted. As a workaround, we attempted to use Change Order to manage these new sub-items. However, sub-item hierarchies created through Change Order are not reflected or displayed in the Budget Payment Application, which limits their usability during the claim process, unlike Cost Payment Application where the hierarchies of Change Order are reflected.   Proposed Enhancement / Workaround Requirement: For this workflow to function effectively, Change Order breakdown details should be visible and usable within the Budget Payment Application. Ideally, the Change Order sub-header name should be able to match an existing SOV sub-header name, allowing relevant breakdowns to populate automatically under the corresponding SOV item. In Change Order, there should be an option to choose whether: the Change Order items remain separate from the SOV, or the Change Order items align with existing SOV item names and populate beneath them. Please refer to Appendix A in the attached document for a visual reference. Show More

回答項目（YES/NOなど）を選択した際の根拠となる理由を記載できるように、それぞれに自由記入欄があることが望ましいです。 ＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝＝ It is desirable to have a free-form field for each answer item (e.g., YES/NO) so that you can write the reasons behind your choice. Show More

With the Manage permission in Assets you should be able to also import assets from models. Now, as of 11th December 2025, it is only the project admins who can do it. This is not good because you preferably want the persons (f.ex. 3rd party) handling Assets not be able to control the whole project. This is especially critical when working with multiple stakeholders. Show More