The ability to progress Assets is a great feature, but sometimes we need to export the Sheet with those Assets markups. Add an export setting to allow users the option to export Sheets with the Asset markups with the corresponding Asset status legend. Show More

Bring back the smooth drawing callout hyperlink navigation that existed on BIM 360 Docs, where the drawing thumbnail would appear when the user hovered over the hyperlink and the user would only need to single click to navigate to the drawing. The Build callout navigation is awkward, annoying and requires more clicking. Show More

Allow users to hide all Issues on Sheets when viewing drawings. In BIM 360 Docs, users were able to select a button to hide all issues on a drawing to make it easier to read if there was a large amount of them. It looks like this feature wasn't migrated over to Build.   We are aware that  we are able to hide all markups, but not all issues. This will be very handy for projects as they approach their completion. I noticed there are filters available, but no way to fully filter out all the issues. Show More

It would be extremely helpful if the app allowed our team to export sheets and print plans directly from their iPads. Our team relies heavily on iPads both in the field and in the office, and they often don’t have access to a computer. As a result, exporting documents through the website isn’t always a practical option. Show More

When the format of sheets changes in new versions and a sheet comparison (Compare Document) is performed, the sheets are scaled to the same format. This results in one sheet being distorted, making comparison impossible. It is important that the sheets retain their original scaling during comparison so that I can move the sheets to compare the desired positions. With the current distorted scaling, comparison is not feasible.   In this Example the Cross on the Sheet has the same position in both versions.   Version 1:   Version 2:   Show More

To help with our workflow it would be nice if the approval stamp was allowed to be pushed in with the publish of sheets. Markups are not pushed through but stamps should be allowed. We have a review folder once the document is reviewed it is stamped and sent to a IFC folder then from there it is published. The IFC folder retains the stamp applied during the review but is lost once published to sheets. Maybe this is not the intended workflow, if not explain, but with this workflow the printable sign off is lost at sheets.  Show More

Currently, you can import rooms from a Revit model as locations in the project, which is great. However, you have to manually draw the location boundaries for each "location" on each sheet. This is very time consuming. It would be great if the ACC pulled the room boundaries right from the model and automatically applied them as locations in the project on every sheet in which that room is shown. This way, when you create issues, you can just click on a point in the room on any sheet and it knows what "location" your in.  Show More

It would be a great enhancement if we could bridge sheets across projects using a selection filter—ideally by “All” or by discipline. Even the ability to mass select would be a big help. Currently, having to manually click through hundreds of sheets (in my case, 960) is quite time-consuming and increases the chance of oversight. A feature like discipline-based bridging would also help prevent errors when new sheets are added. For example, if a Civil sheet is uploaded but wasn’t manually selected, it might be missed even though it’s tagged appropriately. With filtering options, this kind of issue could be easily avoided. It seems like a user-friendly improvement that could streamline the process significantly Show More

There is a need for more granular permissions in Sheets.  Just like photos, sheets are wide open, which is problematic.   We are a design-build company, and many drawings done by us or by a vendor contain proprietary information. We don't want every external user to have access to sheets.  That means we can't invite them to the build module, and this is disappointing and frustrating (the same applies to photos, actually).  We could store all our drawings in files; however, our field crew prefers to have construction drawings in the Sheets module, as they like the functionality on the mobile app. Show More

I would like to have the ability to transfer the sheets (at the very least) that we have in a PlanGrid project, to an ACC project. The sheet numbering and naming has already happen and aren't they technically the same on one platform and the other? I woul like to be able to just grab all the sheets WITH THEIR RESPECTIVE MARKUPS that we have created, and transfer that into an ACC project, so that we don't do everything from scratch. Show More

English: I want to be able to check whether there are any points raised in the sheet list. It would be convenient to be able to export findings and markup-related information to the sheet log. Japanese:   シート一覧で指摘事項があるか確認出来るようにしたい シートログに指摘事項とマークアップ関係の情報も書き出せるようになると便利   Show More

Several projects are not using Sheets and uses files only with titleblock extraction or just models. In the APP half the screen is used for Sheets and is not needed for these projects. If it was possible to edit the layout of the home tab in the APP and home screen for build it would be very helpful.  Projects are using more models than drawings these days.   See green circles.    Show More

Often, I have the same drawing for multiple plans, it would be helpful if I could simply drag over all of the assets in one sheet and then copy and paste them to my mechanical or plumbing drawings. Show More

Autodesk Build currently does mass sheet number and title recognition upon uploading a new drawing version set. However, the next step I typically need to take is to find what changed compared to the last version set.   The existing sheet comparison tool can only be used one sheet at a time. This is impractical to use to compare a fresh set of hundreds of sheets for changes against the previous set. My current workflow is therefore to export the current and previous set from Autodesk Build for offline comparison in Bluebeam, which will compare entire files.   The ideal process would be for Autodesk to compare the new and previous sets upon upload, and present a view of each changed detail on the next screen following sheet tagging and titling, as well as prepare a spreadsheet list of the affected details. However, it would be a substantial reduction in the work required to compare drawing sets if Autodesk simply allowed me to confirm I want the sets compared, emailed me once the comparison was complete, and allowed me to view or download a comparison set that included only the sheets with changes.   With mass sheet comparison, I would be able to provide more timely change pricing to clients, prevent multiple subcontractors from having to comb through sets for changes, and rely less on non-contractual designer narratives of changes. Show More

I would like to be able arrange the Disciplines in a Template to what we typically use since we always have to re arrange the order of disciplines in every job (our sheets are never in alphabetical order which is the default for the disciplines in ACC) Show More

Allow project admins to delete unused Sheet tags. Show More

Locations are created from drawing a closed polyline, but since most room are rectangles, it would be more efficient to click one corner, hold the mouse down, drag to the opposite corner, and release the mouse to create a rectangle. Show More

Not all sheets are captured by the simple single letter identifier and so we need to have multiple disciplines in the search to get all of the drawings in a single discipline. This new list cannot be sorted by floor level and still contain all of the sheets. The ability to choose our own series of columns to use to sort after the search would be very helpful. Show More

To ensure consistency and reduce errors, customers should establish a default set of tags for both Photos and Build Sheets. This helps prevent duplicate or inconsistent tag variations (e.g., "drywall," "GWB," "sheetrock," "gyp board") as well as misspellings. Project Admins should have the ability to manage tag creation permissions—specifically, to enable or restrict the addition of new tags by users. Show More