Expecting all project members to be known at the start and already exist in the corporate directory is completely unrealistic. In practice, new project members are added over the course of a project, at the project level. Ideally, when these new members are linked to the correct company (at the project level), that link should be saved to the corporate directory. It is counterintuitive that if a member’s company-specific email is correctly linked to their company (at the project level), that this information wouldn’t automatically update or save to the corporate directory. The expectation that someone must first add a member to the corporate directory and then later add them to the project directory, doesn’t align with practical workflows and adds unnecessary steps. Just some numbers. Out of 4000 members. About 400 are linked to a company inside the corporate directory. 90% Failure. However, when we look at project directories, we are making these links for the same people every time, multiple times in multiple projects. A huge amount of wasted repetitive work.   Show More

Could we have a column on the Member export that shows who added each member? Show More

It would be incredibly helpful and increase efficiency if there was an option to create a standardized team or followers list. IE: an opportunity is created by myself; I am automatically generated as "Other Followers", and my teammates who also oversee my opportunities are populated under "Other Followers", rather than add them individually for each opportunity. - Opportunity is created - Myself & selected teammates are listed as "Other Followers" - Teammates can assign opportunity to others   Our team receives a multitude of RFP's on a daily basis and we all have coverage on them so nothing gets missed.   If there is an option to add those teammates, that would be super helpful. This should be separate from "Default Followers" from my understanding. Show More

We have our site teams create templates for issues, but have to give them administrator access to do that.   If possible we would like to be able to assign that to Project Member, but restrict it through permissions.   Regards Show More

I have a bunch of hubs I will most likely never need access to again. I wish there was the ability to leave a hub without contacting the admin of some other company, who's contact I no longer have, etc   Show More

When a member is created in a project, the information like the Company assigned and role should follow through to the Account Admin.  Show More

Hi,   I'd like the ability to share files with all project roles, not limited to those with 'Edit' permissions in the file's folder. Currently, I can only select members individually or by company. I'd appreciate an update to the file-sharing settings.   Folder Permissions   File Share Settings         Show More

Being able to display a user name other than fixed in on SSO name.  Show More

Give a stakeholder (eg Architecture Office or Subcontractor) a link to input the required fields for adding members. This will save time for the project admins having to add multiple users continuingly. Once the information is inputted, the users submits, the project admin then just gets a notification to approve or reject and then the users are added to the project.  Show More

Good afternoon,   Simple: I want to scroll through my project members. I want to be able to display more than 20 names per page load. Show More

We'd like to have a question type that pulls the members of the project that have visibility of a form into a multi-select dropdown. Currently, to record the participants of a form, you must have a question that asks for either a text answer or a managed drop-down where resources have to be spent to keep it updated. The form activity will track the account of the device but is not available through the data connector. If users share a device and do not log into their own account it will skew that data.  By having a question for members you can track the responses and create metrics, based on different fields, like if a certain issue type is created from the form. Another example would be getting the average number of people for a work task related to what the form requires; to forecast labor demands. Show More

Dear Development Team, I work within the BIM team at Coventry University, and as part of our approach to maintaining well-structured data, I have created custom attributes and assigned them to the relevant documents and drawings. Currently, the filter setup is member-by-member. It would be highly beneficial to have an option that allows all project members to access the same filters by default, rather than requiring each member to add them manually. Thank you.  Show More

You should be able to remove yourself or personally archive projects that you are no longer working on in ACC Build. I work on a lot of projects and it is difficult to stay organized when I can't remove myself after a project is complete for me. I rarely stay to the end of a project and have more involvement upfront, so waiting until a project admin archives the project is not feasible. Without the admin archiving the project, there are a lot of times that I cannot even stop notifications without contacting the admin for the project.  Show More

A "View As" setting would significantly improve project management. This feature would allow a project administrator to select any user on the project and see exactly what files and folders are visible to a selected user. It would also show what permission levels they have for those files (e.g., View, Download, Edit, Manage). This setting would be invaluable for troubleshooting access issues and verifying that user permissions have been set up correctly without needing to search through each folder's permission settings. It would help ensure data security and prevent accidental information leaks or incorrect access to critical project files. Show More

In the current setup, the ACC Library can only be managed company-wide by the Account Admin. However, in most cases, the ACC account is managed by a very specific group of people, and not everyone is allowed to handle account-related information. The Library is currently tied to the Account Admin role, but this should not be the case. Typically, the Library is managed on a project-by-project basis. Shared parameters vary by project, and Revit families also differ from one project to another. Therefore, it doesn’t make sense to keep the entire Library restricted at the Admin level. Instead, the Library should be managed by selected groups of people from different disciplines and roles. For example, a QA/QC form should be managed by the QA/QC Manager, without requiring that person to be an ACC Admin. A QA/QC Manager should not need account admin rights just to manage their relevant library content. Show More

This really isn't a problem, but more of a suggestion as I have been running into an issue with my superintendents onsite with the member directory. It would be nice if the member directory could also include an area for the scope they are responsible for. IE. Name, Company, contact info, Scope of work (IE.Fire Alarm)   Some sub-contractors are self-explanatory, but others have names that do not reflect the trade they work on.  Show More

Can Member emails be associated to more than one company. Often times, we have owners who create LLC companies associated to each project.  If there is more than one project active with the same owner rep, they can not be associated to more than one company name.  Show More

We need a multi-selection option for project members to be removed as a bulk from a project , as this needs to be done when we need to substitute company by another one for example , and so we need to remove all the current company team members. And this to be done by project admin and not account admin.  Show More

Introduce a feature that allows roles to be assigned to users with a specified expiration date. This would enable temporary role assignments for tasks that need to be completed within a certain timeframe. Once the expiration date is reached, the role is automatically revoked, ensuring that permissions do not remain active indefinitely. Show More