It would be amazing to have a workflow for Issues. Similar to RFI, Submittals, or Reviews. Right now, limiting it to managers only being able to close issues is good, but an automated multi-step review process would be great. We use issues in our prerelease internal review work. This is before our final review for releasing a doc, for which we use the reviews function. It would be fantastic if we had the option to assign the issue to a different person depending on the status or allow people to "submit" a issue and move it to a different step in the workflow so we can better track who is doing what to address the issues. Show More

When you are on a sheet you have to individually click on each issue - this would be good to have a number in the issue pin (instead of the type of pin) and utilize the issue list on the side view to link the number of the pin to the number on the list.  Show More

It would be nice to split out and have independent controls on issues permissions based on visibility and assignment. For my use case, I want a specific role to be able to see all issues (help prevent duplicates) but only be able to assign to their company. Current state to see all issues you then have rights to assign to anyone. Short term it could be solved by adding an entire company as a watcher, but unless you use templates (and depend on the user to select the template), there isn't a way to set a default watcher. Having view only full visibility and assign only to own company would resolve this.   An additional option would be where you can set a role to only be able to assign to a set list of roles.  Show More

When exporting issue reports to Excel from Docs, it would be helpful to have an option to arrange user-defined fields in the desired column order during export.   Currently, the exported fields appear to be sorted alphabetically, making it inconvenient to edit the results afterward. It would greatly improve usability if users could customize the field order when exporting to Excel. Show More

We want to be able to use Issues for tracking Risks across the scheme and print out drawings of where they are physically located using the Issue Pin locations, however this is not possible as the Pins do not contain the Issue Reference Number making it impossible to tie them back to the right issues from the register. It would be great to have this as an option within the settings. Some issue types I want to identify through their Number, some through name. Some through different colours etc. Issues and Issue pins are very powerful and useful tools when communicating risks across a project and we desperately need more features to fully utilise them. I would also like to be able to filter them. For example, I want to create a CDM risk drawing and only show Issue Pins related to CDM risks, not every project-wide issue. This would eliminate duplicate work as we currently need to run a parallel drawing set replicating where the Issue pins are just for this reason so we can filter and tag by number. Show More

Specifications is a great way to mark parts of files. However, they're not visible in the issues in the app version. Specifications connected to an issue are very handy for the people on the construction site. That way they don't have to scroll through dozens of pages and only get to see the relevant information. Show More

It would be great if we were allowed to change the issue status to suit company standards and policies Show More

We’ve been working with the “Assigned Item by Company” report template, and while it’s a great fit for projects with clearly defined company structures, we’ve run into a few challenges.   In many of our projects, subcontractors can change midstream. When that happens, it becomes tricky to track which items still need attention—especially if they were originally assigned to a company that’s no longer involved. We also have cases where multiple subcontractors operate under the same company, and in those situations, it would be much more helpful to slice reports by role rather than by company.   It would be incredibly useful to have the flexibility to switch between assigning items by company or by role, depending on the project setup. This would allow us to generate more accurate and automated reports tailored to how our teams actually work. Show More

Autodesk must implement automated reminders for the following elements within Autodesk Construction Cloud: Issues Reviews Forms Schedules Tasks in Meetings These reminders should notify users when due dates are approaching — for example, 3 days in advance — and must be customizable (e.g., timeframes, notification method). This is not a “nice-to-have” feature — it is a basic, expected function of any professional Common Data Environment (CDE). The lack of reminders creates unnecessary risk, missed deadlines, and drops in project quality and team accountability. Autodesk must prioritize this feature to support effective project delivery and align with standard industry workflows. Thank you  Show More

I am a Project Manager, and when I create an issue, I place it on a large overall drawing sheet in Collections (Sheets) so we can view all issues in one consolidated drawing. However, the General Foreman typically places issues on a shop drawing sheet, which is smaller in scale and contains more detailed information. I’d like the ability to place an existing issue (already created and located elsewhere) onto another drawing without having to create a new issue. This would allow us to view the same issue across different scales of drawings. Show More

If you select 4 issues and then export this - it would be good to have them on the full sheet and a list of issues on the side for those particular drawings. At the moment, we can just export a report but it doesn't show the full drawings. If there is 4 issues on the same drawing they are listed on 4 different pages.     Show More

When adding Photos using the "Use Camera" option in either "Issues" or the "Photo" markup tool, whenever you take multiple photos in the same session, the photos do not retain the same order when you view them in the Issue or in Photos. They are given the same file name, which I think is the problem. You are forced to take one photo and select "Done", then re-enter the "Use Camera" option to keep the order in which you take the photos. This forces the users to hunt for photos, which is frustrating, considering you can't cycle through the photos in the active Issue without closing one and then opening another.    Improving the multi-photo functionality and enabling a scroll function in the Issues tool would be amazing! Show More

It would be better if the latest update were visible at the top rather than at the bottom. Currently, you always have to scroll down to see the latest update. Optionally, consider adding the possibility to reorder or add filters. Show More

In our work environment, there are special requirements regarding data protection and data security. Therefore, we consistently use Microsoft 2FA with Conditional Access for all our devices.   Situation Description: Conditional Access works without issues on Windows devices via the browser. However, on construction sites, using Apple iOS phones and tablets, it is more practical to use an app rather than the browser, especially when a convenient solution for small screens without a notebook is required for construction documentation and error/problem descriptions.   Problem Description: On Apple devices, Conditional Access is only supported by the Edge browser. The native Apple WebKit implementation cannot query the device ID, which makes using the ACC app impossible. Error messages from logon process in the app: Browser not supported "You can’t get there from here" after logging on   Problem Background: The ACC app uses the device’s native WebKit implementation. Due to technical limitations related to the device ID, it cannot meet Azure security requirements. The mobile app seems to call a webview to handle the SSO authentication. This webview always appears as Mobile Safari (the OS default browser setting makes no difference). Mobile Safari cannot retrieve any Intune device information (DeviceID), so the Conditional Access policy cannot determine whether the device is compliant. Furthermore, the webview does not display as the calling app.   Possible Solutions: Relax IT security settings to allow the app to function, or Use a web browser when accessing data from the ACC, or Update the ACC app to use Edge for SSO.   The first solution is not feasible in our environment. The second solution is very cumbersome for users. The third solution would benefit all ACC customers with higher security requirements. The feasibility is demonstrated by various applications such as Citrix, Microsoft itself, or Zoom. Refer to: Webex Conditional Access for Intune with Entra ID   Show More

Issues process: Issues process not so easy to set up if you want to give each stakeholder identical access to the issues, requires regular training of stakeholders to explain the process adapted to their needs. Issues are accessible in several different places (docs, design collaboration, design coordination, build). Depending on where you create the issue (Revit model, plan, view created in model coordination...), the link to the viewpoint will be different if you open the issue from the issues menu between docs, model coordination... Show More

Get the possibility to filter by types the issues which are on the map. Show More

it would be nice to have in the bottom bar a button able to turn on/off the visualization of all the ISSUE pinpoints in the viewer. because when they are a lot, they make it hard the navigation. right now i need to filter by some "fake" parameter in order to clean the view Show More

When an issue is created linked to a clash in design coordination, we need to improve the process in ACC to detect the clash disappears, the status has to change or we want an automatic notification. Show More

The issues are linked to the view. On ACC, if we are doing issues in sheets inside Revit models, we need to see it in 3D, On ACC, if we are doing issues in 3D, we want to see it in 2D drawings too. Show More