It would be great if on the Meeting items we can edit/add other item status values, not only "Open, Ongoing and Closed". The same for the issues part Show More

Things often have to be done quickly on the construction site and if you could then attach a voice note to the issue and work on it straight away in the office, that would be a big advantage. Show More

Like photos, issues should be able to tagged for easier filtering.  Issue types are broad (Punch List, Design) and descriptions should be specific to an issue.  Tags would bridge the gap allowing more detailed reports and make it easier to assign a group of issue to one person to handle (find all the issues involving "Dimensions" or "OPCI Equipment") Show More

In the Meetings section for example, you can add references to your items etc. When trying to add an Issue, it doesn't seem to be possible to search by issue number or sort.  Would be nice to have this, so I don't have to scroll through 100's of issues. Show More

Some issues must go through an internal process before getting closed. If we had some Custom fields only available to certain roles, that had to be completed before closing, it would be very helpful.  Show More

When creating issues in the model coordination space, if you want to check the properties of an existing issue by clicking on an issue tag, you will be taken directly to the view of that issue.  We need to be able to decide whether we want that. For example, double-click to go to the view and single-click to open the issue properties. And have the ability to go to the previous view. Show More

At some point exporting issues to BCF was added to ACC and B360. I found no way to export them from the issues table though but could only get it to work inside model views. Remedy that, please. Show More

ACCdocsで2Dビューの細線表示オプションが効かない。 細線表示オプションOFFでしか表示されないため、太い線が線幅がつぶれた表示で、詳細がわからない。 ACCdocsでもRevitの細線表示オプションが機能するよう、改善を求める。 Show More

We need to be able to Reference email from the Correspondence. This would be useful in Issues and other modules such as RFI. Show More

I suggest using Autodesk Construction Cloud (ACC) Build to map forms and issue statuses to assets for better reporting. Here’s how this can help you: Link Forms and Issues to Assets: Customize forms to capture important details about each asset and connect any issues directly to them. This ensures that problems are tracked and resolved for the specific asset. Create Detailed Reports: Use ACC Build to generate reports that combine data from forms and issues linked to assets. This will give you clear insights into asset conditions, unresolved issues, and completed tasks. Close the Project Cycle: Design Phase: Track and resolve design-related issues before moving to construction. Construction Phase: Monitor progress and fix any issues to keep the project on track. Facility Management Phase: Continue managing and maintaining assets using the data from forms and issues to address any problems promptly. Show More

I have a droplist custom field with around 40 item (packages from submittal module that not exist in RFI And issues) and it's difficult to scroll down to find the relevant package, please add search function to make it easy. Show More

Currently, ACC Issues can only be sorted by Issue Number, description, status, due date but not by the Placement field.  We want to see a  list of issues on a document in a package- in order and the only way to do this is to export issues to excel.  Show More

When you click on an issue, and the issue view is opened (the view that was used to create the issue) and that view has a section applied. When you click on an issue, the section is removed. Currently, I need to have three browser tabs open when running a meeting: one to check the issue number, the second to navigate to the issue and the third to check the properties of an element! It's extremely counterproductive. We should have a toggle in the navigation bar to switch between the issue view and "normal" navigation, so when discussing an issue, we can check the element's properties or do measurements without having to open another view that will have the same section applied. Show More

When we remove a user from a project we loose the metatdata showing the creator of the Issue. It will instead show unknown user. RFIs & Submittals show the user name(removed) as the metatdata and it would be good to have this across Issues as well. Show More

- Ensure that the filter created from a plan is applied to existing filters in the PROBLEMS list. - Display PROBLEMS directly in the plan list, with a colored dot corresponding to their status and the number of associated reservations. - Include the PROBLEM number in the dot, not its type. - Simplify reporting. These limitations are major drawbacks and hinder the large-scale deployment of this solution within the group. Show More

When you export a Forms Report and there are issues within the forms you only get a link to the issues. Would it be useful when exporting the report if you had the option to select give detailed view of issues. This would be useful so you wouldn't have to do a second report to export the issues. Show More

Currently, it is not possible to transfer issues from one Coordination Space to another within Autodesk Construction Cloud (ACC). This limitation creates challenges when managing coordination workflows across multiple spaces or phases of a project. Proposed Solution: Introduce functionality to import issues using BCF files between: Model Coordination spaces and Docs models. This matters because: Improved Workflow Flexibility: Projects often require reorganizing models or creating new coordination spaces for different phases. Being able to move issues ensures continuity without losing valuable clash detection data. Standardized Exchange: BCF is an industry-standard format widely used for issue tracking and interoperability. Supporting BCF would allow teams to maintain issue history and collaborate seamlessly across platforms. Time Savings: Avoids manual recreation of issues, reducing errors and improving efficiency. Additional Considerations: Maintain issue metadata (status, assigned user, comments) during transfer. Allow selective transfer (specific issues or filtered sets). This feature would significantly enhance coordination workflows and align ACC with open standards for interoperability. Show More

現時点では指摘事項で複数の担当者を一括で割り当てるには役割や会社名を統一するしかないが、 複数のメンバーのメールアドレスを一括で登録できる機能を追加してほしいです。   例えば、Excelデータでの取り込み、スペース等でメールアドレスを区切り貼り付けることで一括で割り当てることを可能にしたいです。 Show More

We are able to create custom fields which is great, but not being able to have those fields at the top or where you want when it prints is annoying. For our Quality Issues, we have conforming or non-conforming. The reports are printed off with standard fields and custom fields after. It would be best if we can move custom fields within the standard fields so the report shows how we want it to display.   When reading a QC report, you don't want to wait to scroll to the bottom of the information (customized fields) to know if it's conforming or non-conforming. Currently, you do. Show More