Currently, only weekly publishing is supported. Please expand this option to include at least Daily schedule or custom scheduling multiple times a day of possible. We are trying to push out the latest Revit updates to ACC without the users having to perform this manually. Weekly is just not enough. Thank you Show More

Proposed Feature: Clash Zoom Ratio Option:   Current Behavior: The zoom adjusts to fit both clashing objects, often making it hard to focus on the actual clash when large objects are involved. New Feature: A user-defined zoom ratio setting that allows: Full Object Zoom (default) – Zooms to both clashing objects. Intersection-Only Zoom – Zooms only on the overlapping/clashing area. Custom Zoom Ratio (e.g., 1x, 2x, 5x) – Allows users to define how much surrounding context to include around the clash. Benefits:   More control over clash visualization, especially for large objects like zones or walls. Faster clash resolution by focusing on the important areas. Customization for different workflows, where users can choose between full clash object context or just the intersection. Show More

Feature Request: Box and Fence Selection for Clashes in Coordination Space Description: Introduce Box Selection and Fence Selection tools in the coordination space to enable users to quickly select and isolate clashes within a defined area, especially when dealing with many small elements such as pipes inside insulation, ducts, or other closely spaced MEP and structural components that often indicate a single clash. Currently, clicking and selecting these elements one by one is often impractical, especially in complex models. Box Selection: Allows users to draw a rectangular selection box around an area to isolate clashes within that space, ideal for quickly selecting many small components in a defined region. Fence Selection: Offers a freeform, customizable selection boundary to better target areas with irregular or complex layouts, perfect for handling situations where a single clash is indicated by many tiny, interconnected elements. Key Benefits: Efficiency: Users can quickly select and isolate all elements within a given area, reducing the time spent on selecting each individual item. Improved Workflow: Helps streamline the clash detection and resolution process, particularly in scenarios where many small elements (e.g., pipes, cables, ducts) are involved in a single clash. Greater Precision: The ability to use Box or Fence Selection allows for easy identification of small, closely spaced elements that are part of one larger clash, improving coordination without having to select each element individually. Enhanced User Experience: In large, complex models with dense MEP and structural elements, this functionality ensures that no crucial clash gets overlooked, even when individual elements are hard to select manually. Use Case Example: In an MEP model, a clash might be caused by pipes inside insulation or multiple ducts running close together. Instead of selecting each pipe or duct individually, users could use Box or Fence Selection to highlight the entire area of interest, making it much faster to identify and resolve the clash. Show More

Run clash inside the ACC using Navisworks sets so we can clash Element to Element, instead of Model to Model Saved views from Navisworks to ACC and run clashes on those views so it acts as search sets, and run clashes in ACC model coordination. Show More

Autodesk Customer Technical Success has informed me that web access to ACC from mobile devices (phones and tablets) is not supported, and that the app should be used instead. The issue is that some key functionalities, such as the version comparison tool, are not available in the app. I believe it is essential that this functionality be added to the app in order to ensure proper use of the platform across all devices. ACC is often accessed directly from construction sites, where a computer is not always available, so guaranteeing full functionality from mobile phones and tablets is critical for maintaining efficiency and continuity of work. Thank you in advance. Show More

It's horrible when we can't sinc our revit models and have no idea what is happening, and then look for the outage official dashboard of Autodesk and it's still nothing reported there. I would like a Quick "Report Outage" button in that webpage so that not only Autodesk could get a priority notification that something may be wrong, can give faster feedback and also we can see, as a user community, that we are not alone in having that outage and can give our vote to that reporting - and stop sincronizing without sucess and go on to more productive tasks, while subscribing to notifications on that not even oficial recognized Autodesk outage. Show More

As a Client, I find Navisworks very powerful and effective as a tool to coordinate models produced by different suppliers and to build on top of them, for example creating views or adding properties useful for the O&M activities. ACC could maximise the use of these models, making them accessible directly online. However, ACC does not consistently preserve the visibility settings of the Navisworks saved views or the way custom properties (e.g. hyperlinks) are organised in Navisworks. I think this is a massive shortfall of ACC, which is of hindrance to collaboration and use of models within Client Organisations. Furthermore, it looks like the continuous version updates of ACC are getting things worse, rather than addressing the issue. The idea is about making sure ACC works as an effective tool for online visualisation also for Navisworks models, because Client Organisation mostly rely on Navisworks, rather than other software packages (e.g. Revit). Show More

The 'properties' tab in model viewer currently shows limited or irrelevant information to the average user. It would be good to have a  clear section that you can input into, to show information such as where each part of the model came from and what date, a description and any assumptions made in the modelling (e.g. what surface the levels were draped from). In our BIM model, we can have dozens or hundreds of pipes in the same model, and being able to add properties, especially to multiple at once if possible, would be very useful for traceability or accountability. An enforced naming convention can only go so far. The clearer and more obvious for non-technical users the better. Show More

While we are checking for clash in ACC it provides us the flexibility to check clash between two or more models/views, but does not allow us to check the clash between the Revit categories of a single model/view (e.g. For structure model we want to check the clash between wall and floor of Revit Category).    Show More

Publishing is an essential part of Revit Cloud models and worksharing, because all parties (including design teams, management, etc) would generally like access to the latest models versions through Docs and/or Design Collaboration. This also ensures better version handling and backups.   For workflows that require publishing only models which are approved, the "Live" (Work in Progress) model should be non-accessible to other teams, and sharing through Design Collaboration should be utilized (after publishing either manually or by schedule).   Therefore I think the entire publish workflow needs rethinking. Publishing should not be reliant on Design Collaboration at all. It should be possible to publish and set up a publish schedule from Docs, as done from within Revit, per model or per folder, with or without links, etc. Either that, or at a minimum allow creating ACC project templates which already have the publish schedule defined for each team.   Unfortunately, right now in order to set up a publish schedule, for each team there must first be a model uploaded, and then a schedule has to be set up individually for each team through Design Collaboration. This is time consuming and not straightforward, plus we don't use Design Collaboartion at all in most of our projects except for the need to set up the scheduled publishing, which again does not belong there in my opinion. Show More

The idea is to control the user not to accessing the ACC Account outside of the office premises. Or the User ID should lock to any particular system, which is specified by the IT person.   Reason for asking this solution.  Recently, management has been facing a challenge. Some of the team members who are part of the project have full access to all the folders in ACC Docs. So they are collaborating with the clients and delivering the project details without notifying the management. Show More

Dear All. Using Point Cloud information is becoming more and more necessary due to the great help it offers by capturing the reality of existing facilities and being able to integrate with 3D models of structures, architecture, etc. Currently we can say that the Navisworsk and Recap Pro software are the software that allows us to easily and quickly carry out all the integration of 3D models with the point cloud. Integrating the 3D Models with the point cloud in ACC would be excellent to avoid improving the workflow in order to identify and check interferences, project implementations, etc., and above all, you would have a single CDE to work with. the projects. Using ACC to integrate the point cloud with the 3D models would prevent us from going to other software providers to solve the integration of the 3D models with the point cloud. It must be taken into account that converting the point cloud into a Mesh is not always a solution.   Estimados. Utilizar información de Nube de puntos cada vez se vuelve más necesario por la gran ayuda que ofrece al capturar la realidad de las facilidades existentes y poder integrar con los modelos 3D de las estructuras, arquitectura etc. Actualmente podemos decir que los software de Navisworsk y Recap Pro son los software que nos permite realizar de manera fácil y rápida toda la integración de los modelos 3D con la nube de puntos. Realizar la integración de los Modelos 3D con la nube de puntos en ACC, seria excelente para evitar mejorar el flujo de trabajo con el fin de identificar y comprobar interferencias, implantaciones de los proyectos etc. y sobre todo se tendría un CDE único para trabajar con los proyectos. Utilizar ACC para integrar la nube de puntos con los modelos 3D evitaría que acudiéramos a otros proveedores de software para solventar la integración de los modelos 3D con la nube de puntos.  Hay que tener en cuenta que convertir la nube de puntos en Malla no siempre es una solución. Show More

Idea reported on behalf of Customer: There is a need to add a possibility of clash detection of embedded objects. ACC does not recognize collision in case of smaller mass object inside bigger mass object. Collision is recognized when the surface of one object touches or goes through surface of another object. Show More

Can we please add the ability to delete and archive projects in ACC? Currently, it is a nightmare to find the archive feature and there isn't an option to Delete any projects.   In some cases, we setup test/training projects and would like the ability to remove those from our project list. Show More

We are reluctant to utilize BRIDGE until a live linking option is available.  I feel like this would be desirable for others too. Currently, we can link models from other Projects through the BRIDGE functionality, but we're limited to only getting updates of those links when they are published.  This is not how we prefer to work, and would find much more value if they were automatically updated when synchronized (and then reloaded obviously, or when opening our model and the link is loaded). Show More

I would like to suggest adding an assigned item notification icon to each tool. This way, when I open my ACC, I won’t need to go to My Home and check the dashboard to see the items assigned to me. It would be very helpful if this notification icon could be displayed directly within the modules, next to the tool name, making it easier and faster to track any assigned items. Example: Show More

It would be very useful to allow uploading and managing .html files within Autodesk Construction Cloud. These files are a common export format from Navisworks (for example clash reports and model reviews) and are frequently used by project teams as part of the coordination and validation workflow. Currently, users are forced to convert or compress these files in order to store and share them on ACC, which reduces interoperability and adds unnecessary steps. Allowing direct upload and visualization of HTML files would significantly improve efficiency, maintain workflow continuity, and better align ACC with OpenBIM principles. Show More

I would like to make a suggestion. Regarding the [Account Admin] - [Company] screen, if it were possible to directly navigate to the details of each company's members and projects, or view them in a list format from this screen, I believe it would greatly enhance usability. Currently, checking information for each company requires navigating through multiple screens. This can significantly reduce work efficiency, especially for those managing multiple companies or needing to quickly grasp the status of members and projects. If this feature were implemented, it would offer several benefits: Quick, one-click access to necessary information, significantly reducing the time required for confirmation tasks Easier overview of each company's status for administrators Faster response to changes or transfers of members and projects These improvements would help reduce daily operational stress and enhance overall workflow. I believe many other users may share similar challenges, making this a widely relatable and beneficial enhancement. Show More

Proposal to Update File/Folder Permissions Current Approach: The existing selection pulldown for permissions will be replaced with granular checkboxes for Read/Write/Create (RWC) options for files and folders. Issue Identified: To manage Revit-Cloud-Workshare files, we currently require Edit permissions, which inadvertently allows the creation of subfolders. Proposed Permission Structure: Files: ▢ View: Web-only access ▢ Link: New feature allowing linking within Revit-Cloud-Workshared models (no downloads) ▢ Download: Access to link and download for 'Live' worksharing (no modifications) ▢ Modify: Markups and read/modify capabilities (no uploads or file creation) ▢ Create: Ability to add new files via Collaborate or Desktop Connector ▢ Delete: Permission to delete files Folders: ▢ View: Access to folder contents based on file permissions ▢ Link: Link to folder for reference in other Revit projects ▢ Download: Permission to download folder VIA Desktop Connector ▢ Modify: Ability to modify folder contents ▢ Create: Permission to create subfolders ▢ Delete: Ability to delete subfolders Dependency Logic: Selecting any permission greater than "View" will automatically check and disable "✔View." Remaining permissions can be combined as needed for linking, downloading, modifying, creating, or deleting files and folders. Show More