Bridging Assets with Consultants - Choose what custom fields from assets that you want to Bridge (when this feature becomes available). There may be ones that you wouldn't like to bridge across.  Show More

Currently, when adding a reference to an Asset you cannot choose another existing Asset. This functionality would be critically helpful in tracking our material shipments as they are incorporated into the build in phases. Show More

We are able to create Assets based on Revit model data. This Revit model also contains Sheets, which are the actual drawings used by the operatives on our construction sites. We would like to be able to view the Assets correctly in the Sheets, since it is in fact "all in one Revit model". At the moment ACC does seem to "want to indicate" the Assets on the 2D view, but it does e very poor job at it.   Here are some ideas: 1) Show only the Assets related to the 2D View. The 2D view contains only a portion of the assets of the entire model, so the list of Assets in the viewer should o Assetsnly show these. This would mean faster loading times and much less confusion by allowing the user to only select Assets indicated in the View. 2) When an Asset is selected in the 2D sheets view, it should focus on the Asset geometry. At the moment it focusses on some arbitrary line of the Asset, or "breaks the viewer" 3) One should be able to pick on the geometry of the Asset, and it should select the Asset 4) One should see the Status colour of the Assets also in the 2D View (instead of making tedious markups representing an Asset) like it is possible in the 3D view.   I've uploaded two videos where I try to do the things I presented here. Each item (bracket) in the model of a tower is an Asset and the Sheets are the 2D plan drawings of each floor (level) ... so only a fraction of the Assets are viewable on each sheet.   Regards Show More

Add the ability to export and import Asset templates, similar to what existed in BIM 360 Field Management. Show More

Bring the ability to re-order custom field options like in the issues module, into the assets module.   Options that can be added to drop-downs or multi-selects cannot be re-arranged after they have been created. If you wanted to keep things alphabetically or group certain items together within the custom field, you would have to manually manage that.  Ex. If you had a drop-down field with 9 options and needed to add 1 more alphabetically in the middle, you would need to delete the options until that place and then re-create them. And hopefully you don't have assets created that would need to be corrected afterwards. In the Issues module, you can create an option in a custom field at the bottom of the list and then drag it to where you want it in the list. Show More

Issues pins are great for highlighting locations of issues in different model-formats, pdfs, etc.  It would be great if Assets could be done the same flexible way by just clicking on a 3D model location and filling in (and updating) the asset information. For example in the 3D viewer the Asset tool could be under the Issue tool on the right side panel for manual placing of assets. This kind of Assets could be similar to Issues pins in the model viewer.    Now the Assets can use only rvt, nwc, ifc, dwg for Model location. This probably has to do with limitations of Model-based assets and importing directly from model. This is a smart way to fill in asset information if there are lots of Assets that are created and if those file formats are used. But if only the main assets need to be followed the pin approach would be great. Also it would give the flexibility to place Assets into other file types than rvt, nwc, ifc, dwg. I would need specifically nwd-possibility because that is typically the federated model file format and therefore it is used by most teams (design and construction). Show More

The possibility to save searches for assets, as it is currently possible for file searches.  Show More

Hello,  Since the introduction of the asset systems feature, we have been using it extensively. However, I miss the ability to reference systems to a sheet in the same way as assets, so they can be directly clickable and traceable. Is it possible to include this in a future release?   Best regards Chris Show More

Changing asset categories makes status show as unspecified even in the status are commonly named between asset types. If an asset is set as specified and the asset type is changed, the status shows unspecified even if "specified" is a valid status in the new asset type. This causes some confusion when doing asset imports or trying to understand what's going on with an asset as the status says unspecified even if it was set to specified previously before the type was changed. Show More

If a location is defined on an Asset, it would make sense the location be populated in the associated forms. This is not the case and needs to be populated. If for some reason a user picked a different location, have Build flag those instances to confirm. Show More

For Assets placed on Sheet, currently they can be selected and moved/resized by accident. Would like to add an option to lock asset location on sheets. Show More

Currently, in Autodesk Construction Cloud, all Custom Fields under Assets > Settings are stored in a single list. As the number of fields grows, this makes it harder to organise, locate, and maintain them—especially for accounts managing multiple asset categories or large, complex projects.   On the US and EU servers, there is no equivalent functionality yet either, but introducing folders (or a similar grouping method) would allow Custom Fields to be organised logically, improving usability and reducing administrative errors.   Why It Matters: Long, unstructured Custom Field lists are hard to navigate. Higher risk of selecting the wrong field when configuring Assets. Additional time required for training and onboarding new staff. Inconsistent organisation across projects and teams. Solution: Enable folders or grouping for Custom Fields within Assets > Settings, so that users can categorise fields by asset type, project phase, discipline, or other relevant criteria.   Benefits: Faster navigation and easier field selection. Reduced errors and rework. More consistent setup across projects. Better scalability for accounts with complex asset structures. If you support this improvement, please vote and comment to help prioritise it. Show More

We are creating assets for interiors where we are grouping the assets by room type (bedroom, bathroom, kitchen, etc.) but we cannot create multiple shapes for the same asset. The current workaround is to use the highlight function to highlight separate areas for the same asset, but it is less than ideal. Show More

When creating a template for a form, it would be more streamline if I could add a form template to multiple assets and when it attaches to multiple assets it makes copies of the template to each of the assets. Right now it only adds one form across all the assets, its needs to be all different forms for each asset. When  Editing a form template, its needs to also update to all open forms that may or may not be attached to an asset. If I change a template it needs to take effect to all of those forms that share that form template. Does not need to change closed / submitted forms When changing permissions for the forms, I would like to change multiple form permissions at once. The process to change permissions for all templates that exist is too cumbersome.    All of these features exist in other commissioning applications and would be nice to have these features for ACC.  Show More

Add the functionality to mass upload data from an excel sheet into a form template. Assets seem to have the functionality to populate fields with an excel template, but forms does not. Forms is lacking any sort of mass change feature and only copy/paste from a previously created form. After creating a form template using build, give the ability to download an excel template of that form for mass changes or auto generating new forms.   Forms is good for staying organized but bad at inputting changes to data, especially if there was an error when creating the form and need to mass change a section/question. I would use assets for this feature but it creates way too many fields and becomes disorganized. Also forms on the mobile version needs to change navigation of detailed forms. I have multiple sections with multiple questions which leads to endless scrolling. Add the feature to select from a tab or drop down for each section. Show More

At the moment, when importing assets from a model to ACC, an import rule needs to be manually created for each asset category in the 'map assets' step. This is very time consuming and annoying because the same import rules will be used for all projects. With a template, filters can be created only once and be reused for future models, saving a lot of time and repeated actions.   Needless to say, the same goes for the 'map properties' step of the process. Show More

Form templates assigned to the Asset are visible in the references section of an Asset. This indicates that this Form Template is missing and should be filled for this Asset. The actual Form instance is only created after clicking on the placeholder entry.   Show More

We currently invest a significant amount of time creating takeoff types and markups to establish accurate quantity data during the estimating phase. However, once the project moves into execution, we often have to recreate the same structure manually in Assets to begin tracking progress—resulting in duplicated effort and a high risk of inconsistencies. It would be a major efficiency gain if Takeoff could sync directly with Assets, allowing takeoff types, quantities, and associated markups to be pushed or linked into the Assets module for progress tracking. This would ensure a seamless transition from estimating to execution, maintain alignment between scoped quantities and tracked work, and significantly reduce manual re-entry. Ideally, this sync would also preserve metadata like classification systems, units of measure, and any custom attributes, enabling a more integrated and accurate tracking workflow across the project lifecycle. Show More

Would like to request to export all references in the Asset Module that are assigned. Right now, we have to click on references and select one by one in order to download. When there are several that are attached to the asset it would be nice to have a select all button to export all at once to send with our package for closeout.   Thank you. Show More