We would like to propose a feature enhancement for the Autodesk Construction Cloud system. Currently, certain account activities or changes may occur without the awareness of the existing Account Administrators. To improve governance and administrative oversight, we would like to request the implementation of a feature that sends automatic notifications to the existing Account Administrators whenever key account-level changes or actions are performed. This notification mechanism would help ensure better transparency, accountability, and timely awareness of administrative activities within the account. Show More

We would like to propose a feature enhancement for the Autodesk Construction Cloud system.   Currently, folders within ACC Files do not have the option to set a password to prevent access by other members. We would prefer to have an additional layer of security on top of the existing access control. This is intended to protect highly confidential folders that may be unintentionally accessed by members who are not supposed to have visibility. A password-protected folder feature would provide an extra layer of protection against unintended access and visibility by unauthorized members. Show More

It should be possible, when working inside an issue and referencing a 360° photo, to handle 360° photos the same way as regular photos. We imagine the following workflow: When working in the ACC app, the user should be able to go to a task and, under “Add Photo,” directly access the 360° camera, capture the photo, and upload it immediately. Show More

I would like the option to use the meetings tab in the Docs module. We often need to record meetings to discuss issues related to documentation in Docs. We need to use a Build license to access meetings only. Show More

I would like the option to use the correspondence tab in the Docs module. We often need an email box to deal with documentation issues in Docs. We need to use a Build license to access correspondence only. Show More

It would be helpful if Docs could allow copying a blank folder structure as a template within the same project. This structure will be repeated multiple times. Currently, this copying is only possible via Desktop, not online. Show More

Ich möchte einen Verbesserungsvorschlag einbringen. Aktuell haben die Kollegen bei der Erstellung von Aufgaben/Issues Schwierigkeiten, die benutzerdefinierten Werte schnell zu finden, da diese nicht alphabetisch sortiert sind. Ich schlage vor, dass die benutzerdefinierten Werte automatisch alphabetisch sortiert werden. Dies würde die Benutzerfreundlichkeit erheblich erhöhen und die Effizienz bei der Arbeit mit Aufgaben/Issues steigern. Vielen Dank für Ihre Überlegung zu diesem Vorschlag. Show More

Allow editing/commenting of word documents for review workflows in Docs Module. Similar to contract review workflows.  Show More

For user-friendliness and clarity, it would be good if Revit files could be sorted alphabetically in the Viewer under Model Browser. Show More

Aparently when linking the coordination model from ACC in Navisworks, the result geometry elements lack critial information like the Category (as a paremeter for rule creation, we can see it in the file tree) and, much more important, it lack the revit ID number (or even the revit GUID - the GUID it has it's one dreated for Navisworks). The problem with this, is that when issues are created, they are created in that NWD file and shared with everyone in ACC, we cannot easily find where that issue is because there is no ID number we can use to find the elements in our working files.   Autodesk is sugesting the following "dynamo script" as a workaround - but that is not a viable long term workflow. Revit Item GUID not matching with Navisworks GUID   We really need this to fixed ASAP, please. I trust it can be simple. This is a Navisworks problem (with ACC implications), but there is no Idea Forum for Navisworks, so feel free to move this idea/request if you feel there is a more apropriate forum for this. Thank you.   Show More

Many admins are on the road quite often and projects face risk of delays as admin have to wait until they are at a computer to adjust permissions, add members, etc. A specific app for admin OR admin capabilities in the current app would do wonders. Show More

Customers migrating into ACC have identified a major roadblock in the lack ability to programmatically import Correspondences. While the endpoint exists (POST /construction/correspondence/v1/projects/:projectId/import) and functions as a true import - preserving original email metadata, dates, and attachments - it is currently restricted and only usable through the UI, preventing automated migrations at scale. As a result, teams are forced into manual, time consuming uploads that make large migrations unfeasible. Making this endpoint publicly available to authenticated APS applications would immediately unlock full-fidelity correspondence migration, reduce implementation friction, eliminate manual handling of sensitive records, and directly support faster onboarding. Show More

Currently, Autodesk Construction Cloud (ACC) limits the number of assignees per Submittal to a maximum of 10 users. For large-scale construction projects, this limitation creates significant workflow challenges. We strongly request increasing this limit to at least 30 individual assignees.         Background & Problem Statement     ACC Submittals are designed to track review status per individual assignee, which is a very valuable capability for accountability and auditability.   However, the current limitation causes issues because:   Submittals often require review by many individual stakeholders, not just roles or companies Role-based or Company-based assignees do not fit workflows where: Individual approval status must be visible Review history needs to be tracked per person   Individual-based assignment is essential for: Compliance Accountability Long-term record keeping of who reviewed what and when             Business Impact     Due to the 10-user assignee limit, teams managing large projects are forced to:   Create multiple duplicate Submittals for the same document Partially revert to manual or paper-based workflows Use additional tools outside ACC to complete reviews     This significantly reduces efficiency and undermines ACC’s value as a centralized platform for large projects.   Additionally, Submittals templates often reach the maximum limit (250 templates) more quickly due to duplicated workflows created solely to bypass the assignee restriction.         Requested Enhancement     Increase the maximum number of individual Submittals assignees to at least 30 users Maintain the current functionality of: Individual review status visibility Per-user approval history tracking             Expected Benefits     Enables ACC to fully support large and complex project workflows Eliminates the need for duplicate Submittals and manual processes Improves adoption of ACC as a true enterprise-level construction management platform         This enhancement would significantly improve usability for teams managing large-scale projects and better align ACC Submittals with real-world industry requirements.   Thank you for your consideration. Show More

The signature function in Submittal (specifically the E-signature field in fillable PDFs) requires users to draw a signature or upload an image for each individual PDF. Storing the signature on ACC would save significant time by allowing users to apply it with a single click. Show More

When a user is in the Asset module of Build that user, when selecting an asset, the user has the possibility, with a hyperlink (or a button) to go and view the asset in the 3D model in a second tab. It can be a similar than the one in Revit when you are in a schedule, you have a button to highlight the asset in Revit. Show More

Currently, you cannot edit Excel, Word, or other Office documents from the ACC app. You can only open them, Save as and upload it again. This is a lot of work and complicated for people on the job site Show More

All of our users are misunderstanding what Delegate within the review means, as it does not absolve the key reviewer's obligation to complete the review. We need a managed way to properly delegate, as per the word's original meaning. We need a way to allow Key reviewers to delegate their role as key reviewer to named users (for example, only users within their organisation, not anyone).  And we want this to be logged in the review history for the record.  Autodesk explains it like this: When the Main Reviewer delegates to an Optional Reviewer, they are essentially saying: "I want your opinion, but I am still the one officially responsible for this step." Even if the Optional Reviewer completes their review and adds comments, the Main Reviewer must still log in and click "Submit Review" to push it to the final step. The system treats the Optional Reviewer’s input as "feedback" for the Main Reviewer, not as a replacement for the Main Reviewer’s action. Based on their explanation, that is not the definition of the word Delegate. Can the word Delegate be rephrased to avoid confusion and can Autodesk improve on how the actual delegation works, giving managers insight and control?  Show More

   To generate a sequence, or video, that displays the data included in Asset with execution dates already established by a color code. This execution sequence can be generated, similar to the tracking shown in Synchro or Navisworks, with the video linking to the task schedule. Show More

It would be nice if we had a way to setup Milestones in Build Home either manually (current workflow) or by "publishing" schedule items of a client's choosing from Schedule to Milestones. Show More