We would like the RFI Detail Report to be able to in Excel format. We need the "Suggested Answer" to show up on our report (and we need this in Ecxel format), but the Detail Report does not allow this - only .pdf.  The Summary Report can be downloaded as an excel file, but does not show the Suggested Answer. Show More

I'd like to see improvements to ACC's markup functionality, but since I currently rely on Goodnotes for markup, I'd like to see better integration between Goodnotes and ACC Docs in the iPad app. Specifically, I'd like to be able to import PDF files directly from ACC Docs to Goodnotes, and save PDF files directly from Goodnote to ACC Docs. Again, this is a request on the iPad. Show More

So, they did it again. As of september Business Units finally came available to use in ACC. Big huray moment. That didn't last. First it was visible for the our project creators, but they could not select/set it. Only the account admin was able to use it. So we opened a case for that. The solution? Remove visibility of the function for projectcreators..... So basically, the whole function is now unusable. You can't set business unit in a project template (which would be preferred, but at least would be a workaround if you don't want project creators to assign the business unit). So the account admin has to create ALL projects if you need to use businiss units? That's like having a CEO write out all paychecks personally for all employees..... The answer from Autodesk: it's by desing... (again). We are so disappointed with this. PLEASE, PLEASE make this workable, let it either be setup in the project templates (which would be the best option) or let it at least be assigned by project creators! Show More

It would be nice to link a view point of Modell Coordination direct in meeting notes. That would help the users to improve the meeting speed (and handling) and skip the discussion on drawings.  Show More

When Payment Application is rejected during the approval workflow, we suggested that the status of Payment Application will be changed to ‘Submitted’ rather than ‘Revise and Resubmit’.    If the user click 'Submitted' button, the claimed Work Completed would take the Work Completed amount which is inaccurate. The Claimed Work Completed should remain as the supplier’s first submission. The submitted status should remain the Claimed Work Completed original amount and allow the user to edit the Work Completed amount instead. Show More

At the moment every user has to select the accurancy settings for the measurements every time again when open the coordination view. In infrastructure projects we work with Millimeter accurancy. The setting should be stored. Ohterwise the user has to do many clicks before the information is usefull.  Show More

Following the ISO 19650 folder structure for large civil and infrastructure projects, correctly assigning folder permissions is essential. Currently, this process is challenging because there is no way to link the assigned user’s company with their role. Creating ISO 19650-based roles is not desirable, as it would result in an excessive number of roles, reducing clarity. In the worst case, permissions would need to be assigned individually to users. To address this, it would be highly beneficial to enable a relationship between companies and roles when assigning folder permissions (and/or rules). This would: Simplify the setup of large-scale projects and streamline permission management during execution. Eliminate the need for user-based permissions, improving overall data access security. Reduce role clutter at both the project and hub levels, maintaining readability and manageability. New users automatically inherit correct permissions based on their company-role relationship, minimizing manual setup. Resulting in faster onboarding Easier to track and verify access rights for compliance with ISO 19650 and internal governance. Supports growth and complexity in large projects without exponentially increasing role management complexity.     Show More

Would it be possible to add some design entity-related keywords to the "Work Performed" section under the Company Profile tab in Building Connected? Specifically for companies that also provide design services, it would be helpful if electrical engineer, mechanical engineer, etc. were on the keywords list.  Show More

RFIs have a variety of applications. At time questions are submitted for review that aren't necessary. These unnecessary RFIs then dilute the reporting, and status of RFIs which are legitimate. There needs to be an RFI status where the "reviewer" can provide a response that states something like: "Refer to contract documents", or "Included in Plans and Specs" etc. This is necessary to avoid the dilution of RFI status reports with information that could appear as "Open". They also drive up the number of RFIs and required additional resources for review and response - through normal workflows. Show More

At the moment it would be very helpful to show point clouds in the model coordination view together with models and other information's. That would save a lot of time to create models from existing condition. It would enable the project team to discuss fast in 3D in meetings to find solutions. A mesh is not a solution because of details and the accuracy. See example pictures of other CDE types for inspiration. Show More

It would be nice to sort different coordination spaces for the users in the table and for selection. At the moment the coordination spaces are sorted only by creation date. That is in big projects difficult to handle because they need up to 10 spaces with a minimum logic. (Area, Topic,...) Show More

Currently, when initiating a workflow in Autodesk Construction Cloud, only approvers can be added to the process. However, many change orders require additional people from our organisation to be informed of change orders for visibility and awareness purposes, without requiring them to take any approval action. Introducing a “notify-only”  option within workflows would allow users to include these stakeholders and automatically notify them when a change order is initiated or updated, while keeping the approval chain unchanged. This enhancement would improve communication, reduce manual follow-ups outside the system, and ensure that relevant teams such as commercial, finance, or project controls have real-time visibility without impacting workflow efficiency Show More

It would be nice to have a customizable text box on the cover page of a report. This is important for issue detail reports (punch reports) that apply to specific areas but not the whole project and also for being able to include some default legal language without having to edit the pdf of the report after the fact. For a current program we have, typically we will see 10+ reports generated per project and there are hundreds of projects, so eliminated a repetitive task at scale would be a wonderful time saver! Show More

We request the implementation of a direct PDF export functionality within the "Comments in Review" report. The current Excel format presents configuration issues (layout, line breaks), requiring a manual and doubled effort to reformat the document and subsequently convert it to PDF. Including the PDF option will streamline the process and ensure the integrity of the report's layout. Show More

When adding bidders from one of your Bidder List Templates to a Bid Package inside a Project (+Add Bidders > Import tab), it would be helpful to make the list of Bid Packages expandable (located in the center of the window) after you've selected the desired Bidder List Template (on the left side of the window). That way, the user would have the option to select one, multiple or all bidders contained within each Bid Package of the Bidder List Template instead of having to add all bidders and then deleting any unwanted parties from the Selected Bidders section on the right side of the window. Show More

Overview Today, Autodesk Build Forms only support the creation of interactive forms through manual field creation or by uploading a PDF. However, many construction workflows rely heavily on Excel-based templates that include formulas, conditional logic, predefined data structures, and standardized layouts. When attempting to convert these Excel files into PDF to use them in Autodesk Build, much of this logic is lost. Problem Our teams frequently work with Excel templates that are already validated internally and used across multiple projects. These files often contain formulas that automatically calculate values, ensure consistency, and reduce manual input errors. When converting these templates to PDF, the formulas and built-in logic are removed, resulting in a non-interactive and error-prone form within Autodesk Build. Requested Feature We would like Autodesk Build to support Excel (.xlsx) upload directly as a Form template, preserving: -Cell formulas -Conditional formatting -Dropdown lists / data validation -Locked/protected cells -Predefined calculation fields -Embedded metadata Build would then automatically convert the Excel structure into a fully interactive form, similar to the existing PDF auto-field detection, but without losing the business logic native to Excel. Why This Matters -Reduces manual work and repeated form rebuilding -Avoids errors caused by manual data entry -Leverages existing company-standard templates -Improves consistency across project teams -Allows organizations to maintain a single source of truth for engineered forms -Enhances adoption of Autodesk Build across field teams Show More

Please enable the ability to configure Section Assignees in Autodesk Build Form Templates at both the Account Library level and within Project Templates. Today, Section Assignees can only be set inside an active project, after the form has already been deployed AND copied, which prevents standardized, centralized setup.   Current Limitation Section Assignees are not available when creating or editing a form in the Account Library Section Assignees do not carry through Project Templates Project Admins must manually turn on Section Assignees in every project This results in inconsistent forms across teams and an added administrative burden   Why This Matters Organizations managing multiple projects expect form templates to deploy with a consistent structure and consistent role-based responsibilities. Without Section Assignees in Library or Project Template mode, form template behavior varies from project to project, increasing setup time and the risk of missed reviews or incomplete workflows.   Requested Enhancement Add support for: Assigning roles, companies, or members to each form template section directly in the Account Library Saving those assignments as part of the form template Deploying form templates into projects with Section Assignees already in place Optionally updating Section Assignees across existing projects when a form templates are updated Impact Ensures consistent review and handoff workflows across all projects Reduces repetitive manual configuration Allows true centralization of form template management Improves compliance and quality control for enterprise customers Show More

Assets Filtering Save option like Docs for private and shared searches.   Show More

When sending emails via the Correspondence tool, embedded images from email signatures (such as banners or logos) are automatically added as attachments. As the email thread continues, these images keep accumulating, resulting in unnecessary attachments and cluttered correspondence.   Suggested Improvement: Add an option to automatically exclude embedded signature images from being treated as attachments. Alternatively, provide a toggle or filter to ignore images below a certain size or marked as signature content. This would improve email clarity, reduce redundant attachments, and enhance overall correspondence management. This enhancement would significantly improve usability, especially for projects with frequent email exchanges and standardized corporate signatures. Show More