Matt, hopefully you'll have the time to comment on my computer parts list.
In particular, would you go ahead and get the >300w power supply?
- Jim
"Matt Stachoni" wrote in message
news:h0tevug3r6rdjltso07ioj7oeb8ahbjtu0@4ax.com...
> Terry,
>
> If you are set on staying with the P4 platform, I recommend upping the
> CPU to 2.53GHz (it seems to be a real sweet spot right now,
> price/performance wise) and use DDRAM instead of RDRAM. For the kind
> of work you will be doing on it, you don't need a Quadro or FireGL
> card - a cheap GeForce 3 or 4 will do. I recommend something with
> 64MB, though, which is still very inexpensive. You base system isn't
> bad, but I can't really understand the value relationship without some
> hard numbers on the machines you are specifying.
>
> However, if you really want to save some money, I could easily
> recommend moving to the Athlon CPU on the nVidia nForce2 motherboard
> platform using DDRAM. That should allow you to up the video card to
> GF4/128MB status.
>
> Whatever you do, MAKE SURE you have at least 512MB in the system.
>
> Matt
> mstachoni@bhhtait.com
> mstachoni@comcast.net
>
>
>
> On Wed, 11 Dec 2002 06:21:55 -0800, "Terry Scanlon"
> wrote:
>
> >We are ordering some new workstations. Like many of you, we are on a
> >budget. I am interested on opinions about sacrificing CPU speed and
getting
> >a better graphics card. Here are some scenarios:
> >
> >Base: 2.26Ghz P4, ATI Radeon VE 32mb
> >-$60: 2.20Ghz P4, Quadro2 EX 32mb
> >+$50: 2.00Ghz Xeon P4, Fire GL E1 64mb
> >
> >Our work consists of Civil 2d CAD, sometimes with lots of presentation
> >hatching, or digital orthophoto backgrounds. Some of the civil add on
> >routines can be processor intensive as well.
> >
> >Terry Scanlon
> >
>