topic Re: in Visual LISP, AutoLISP and General Customization Forum

Difference between a SUBR and a EXRXSUBR???

Anonymous — Tue, 01 Feb 2000 19:19:30 GMT

What is the difference between a SUBR type LISP function and an EXRXSUBR
type LISP function??
--
----------
Kevin Nehls
for reply remove -ns-

Re: Difference between a SUBR and a EXRXSUBR???

Anonymous — Wed, 02 Feb 2000 01:53:47 GMT

SUBR is a function built into the lisp interpreter whereas EXRXSUBR is
function that's implemented in an ARX program (EXternal aRX subroutine).

Kevin Nehls wrote:

What is the difference between a SUBR type LISP function
and an EXRXSUBR

type LISP function??

--

----------

Kevin Nehls

for reply remove -ns-

Re:

Anonymous — Wed, 02 Feb 2000 16:22:55 GMT

Can you please repost your reponse (if there is a response)? I have run
into this before (not being able to see some responses to a thread), but it
has never been to a thread that I was really interested in.

Thank you,
Kevin Nehls
for reply remove -ns-

Re:

Anonymous — Wed, 02 Feb 2000 19:19:44 GMT

Kevin,

For what it's worth, sometimes the reply is in HTML. Usually I can read
these OK. Sometimes I am only able to read them by selecting "Reply to
Group." Occasionally I cannot read them at all until someone replies in
plain text.

One disadvantage to using this archaic newsreader. 😞
--
Dave D

Kevin Nehls wrote in article
<01bf6d99$7d289a20$6b0c10ac@toc0156>...
> Can you please repost your reponse (if there is a response)? I have run
> into this before (not being able to see some responses to a thread), but
it
> has never been to a thread that I was really interested in.
>
> Thank you,
> Kevin Nehls
> for reply remove -ns-
>

Re:

Anonymous — Wed, 02 Feb 2000 19:53:25 GMT

Same here.
--
----------
Kevin Nehls
for reply remove -ns-

David Doane wrote in article
<01bf6db2$63e4ab80$8355d2d0@lms-1>...
> Kevin,
>
> For what it's worth, sometimes the reply is in HTML. Usually I can read
> these OK. Sometimes I am only able to read them by selecting "Reply to
> Group." Occasionally I cannot read them at all until someone replies in
> plain text.
>
> One disadvantage to using this archaic newsreader. 😞
> --
> Dave D

Re:

Anonymous — Thu, 03 Feb 2000 03:07:58 GMT

I don't think you should blame your newsreader.
It has been a long usenet tradition to post
in plain text *only*.

On 2 Feb 2000 19:19:44 GMT, "David Doane"

wrote:

>Kevin,
>
>For what it's worth, sometimes the reply is in HTML. Usually I can read
>these OK. Sometimes I am only able to read them by selecting "Reply to
>Group." Occasionally I cannot read them at all until someone replies in
>plain text.
>
>One disadvantage to using this archaic newsreader. 😞

Re:

Anonymous — Thu, 03 Feb 2000 16:09:46 GMT

Ah, but it is sooo much easier to show code corrections in color! Please
don't be mad at me when I choose to use the latest technology to better
communicate. After all, if tradition had its way, we would still be drafting
on the board! Oooh, I bet the flame mail cometh on this one too!

--
R. Robert Bell, MCSE
Network Administrator (or, Modern-day Wizard)
(remove the "not." in my address for direct e-mail)

Vladimir Nesterovsky wrote in message
news:389bf083.2934469@adesknews.autodesk.com...
> I don't think you should blame your newsreader.
> It has been a long usenet tradition to post
> in plain text *only*.

Re:

Anonymous — Thu, 03 Feb 2000 16:44:27 GMT

No flame mail here. I just not able to upgrade to a newer newsreader at
work. I agree with you on using the latest technology (as I do at home).

BTW, I can see your colored text in Internet News.
--
----------
Kevin Nehls
for reply remove -ns-

R. Robert Bell wrote in article
<87c98h$c8k14@adesknews2.autodesk.com>...
> Ah, but it is sooo much easier to show code corrections in color! Please
> don't be mad at me when I choose to use the latest technology to better
> communicate. After all, if tradition had its way, we would still be
drafting
> on the board! Oooh, I bet the flame mail cometh on this one too!
>
> --
> R. Robert Bell, MCSE
> Network Administrator (or, Modern-day Wizard)
> (remove the "not." in my address for direct e-mail)
>

Re:

Anonymous — Thu, 03 Feb 2000 16:53:12 GMT

Sounds like you have a "Data Nazi" at work (at least, that's what I've been
called before, at work)!

--
R. Robert Bell, MCSE
Network Administrator (or, Modern-day Wizard)
(remove the "not." in my address for direct e-mail)

Kevin Nehls wrote in message
news:01bf6e65$a9791420$6b0c10ac@toc0156...
> No flame mail here. I just not able to upgrade to a newer newsreader at
> work. I agree with you on using the latest technology (as I do at home).

Re:

Anonymous — Thu, 03 Feb 2000 17:02:58 GMT

Not really, I've just had problems with Outlook Express on this computer
(and I don't have the time to trouble shoot at work) and Internet News
serves my needs.

"Data Nazi" huh??? I guess I could be called a "Data Nazi in training", I
just earned my MCP and am on my way to my MCSE (hopefully to become a
Network Admin or consultant somewhere)

--
----------
Kevin Nehls A+, MCP, drafter
for reply remove -ns-

R. Robert Bell wrote in article
<87cbpv$ca017@adesknews2.autodesk.com>...
> Sounds like you have a "Data Nazi" at work (at least, that's what I've
been
> called before, at work)!
>
> --
> R. Robert Bell, MCSE
> Network Administrator (or, Modern-day Wizard)
> (remove the "not." in my address for direct e-mail)
>
>

Re:

Anonymous — Thu, 03 Feb 2000 17:04:49 GMT

Nice signature line !

Kevin Nehls wrote in message
news:01bf6e68$3ff5f100$6b0c10ac@toc0156...
> Not really, I've just had problems with Outlook Express on this computer
> (and I don't have the time to trouble shoot at work) and Internet News
> serves my needs.
>
> "Data Nazi" huh??? I guess I could be called a "Data Nazi in training", I
> just earned my MCP and am on my way to my MCSE (hopefully to become a
> Network Admin or consultant somewhere)
>
> --
> ----------
> Kevin Nehls A+, MCP, drafter
> for reply remove -ns-

Re:

Anonymous — Thu, 03 Feb 2000 17:16:30 GMT

Thanks (I think). But I like yours better.

[ R. Robert Bell, MCSE
Network Administrator (or, Modern-day Wizard)
(remove the "not." in my address for direct e-mail) ]

--
----------
Kevin Nehls "Data Nazi in training"
for reply remove -ns-

R. Robert Bell wrote in article
<87ccfp$c8i20@adesknews2.autodesk.com>...
> Nice signature line !
>

Re:

Anonymous — Thu, 03 Feb 2000 17:30:49 GMT

Yeah, that extra letter _was_ more work!