<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Sign convention for axial forces in Structural Bridge Design Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/structural-bridge-design-forum/sign-convention-for-axial-forces/m-p/7578598#M2840</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could anyone please tell me the sign convention for the axial force in a section.&amp;nbsp;Is compression in the section represented by a positive force (Ax) or the negative force in the loadcase?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:24:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-28T14:24:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Sign convention for axial forces</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/structural-bridge-design-forum/sign-convention-for-axial-forces/m-p/7578598#M2840</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could anyone please tell me the sign convention for the axial force in a section.&amp;nbsp;Is compression in the section represented by a positive force (Ax) or the negative force in the loadcase?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:24:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/structural-bridge-design-forum/sign-convention-for-axial-forces/m-p/7578598#M2840</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-28T14:24:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sign convention for axial forces</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/structural-bridge-design-forum/sign-convention-for-axial-forces/m-p/7578766#M2841</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Deleted as posted by mistake in the ASBD rather than RSA forum.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:44:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/structural-bridge-design-forum/sign-convention-for-axial-forces/m-p/7578766#M2841</guid>
      <dc:creator>Artur.Kosakowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-28T15:44:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sign convention for axial forces</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/structural-bridge-design-forum/sign-convention-for-axial-forces/m-p/7578904#M2842</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Could anyone please tell me the sign convention for the axial force in a section.&amp;nbsp;Is compression in the section represented by a positive force (Ax) or the negative force in the loadcase?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In ASBD we use the following sign conventions in design sections and design beams:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;      Moment&lt;/STRONG&gt;     &lt;STRONG&gt;Axial&lt;/STRONG&gt;
 &lt;STRONG&gt;+ve&lt;/STRONG&gt;  sagging    compression
 &lt;STRONG&gt;-ve&lt;/STRONG&gt;  hogging    tension&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:34:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/structural-bridge-design-forum/sign-convention-for-axial-forces/m-p/7578904#M2842</guid>
      <dc:creator>Philip.Lee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-28T15:34:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

