<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Simply Supported Slabs and Beams – One-Way vs Two-Way Behaviour in Robot in Robot Structural Analysis Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/simply-supported-slabs-and-beams-one-way-vs-two-way-behaviour-in/m-p/13967471#M85904</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am new to Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis and I am modelling a single-storey building with walls, columns, beams, and slabs.&amp;nbsp;I want to model the slabs as simply supported and compare the results assuming one-way and two-way slab behaviour. I have tried:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Changing the Panel Calculation Model to the Simplified (trapezoidal/triangular) method for both one-way and two-way slabs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Applying linear releases along slab edges (I am still getting small moment peaks at the slab edges, and the slab behaviour does not clearly reflect the intended support conditions.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using orthotropic material properties to increase stiffness in one direction only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Changing the slab model from Shell to Load Take-Down one-way and two-way (When u&lt;SPAN&gt;sing &lt;/SPAN&gt;Load Take-Down&lt;SPAN&gt;, the &lt;/SPAN&gt;beam results seem closest&lt;SPAN&gt; to what I expect for simply supported behaviour; however, in this case &lt;/SPAN&gt;no slab results are available&lt;SPAN&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also want to model the beams as simply supported, but end releases do not seem to fully remove continuity effects or moments at the supports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would appreciate some advice how to model this please. This is the model file for reference.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance for your help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 09:46:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ashley_calleja0806</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-01-07T09:46:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Simply Supported Slabs and Beams – One-Way vs Two-Way Behaviour in Robot</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/simply-supported-slabs-and-beams-one-way-vs-two-way-behaviour-in/m-p/13967471#M85904</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am new to Autodesk Robot Structural Analysis and I am modelling a single-storey building with walls, columns, beams, and slabs.&amp;nbsp;I want to model the slabs as simply supported and compare the results assuming one-way and two-way slab behaviour. I have tried:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Changing the Panel Calculation Model to the Simplified (trapezoidal/triangular) method for both one-way and two-way slabs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Applying linear releases along slab edges (I am still getting small moment peaks at the slab edges, and the slab behaviour does not clearly reflect the intended support conditions.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using orthotropic material properties to increase stiffness in one direction only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;Changing the slab model from Shell to Load Take-Down one-way and two-way (When u&lt;SPAN&gt;sing &lt;/SPAN&gt;Load Take-Down&lt;SPAN&gt;, the &lt;/SPAN&gt;beam results seem closest&lt;SPAN&gt; to what I expect for simply supported behaviour; however, in this case &lt;/SPAN&gt;no slab results are available&lt;SPAN&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also want to model the beams as simply supported, but end releases do not seem to fully remove continuity effects or moments at the supports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would appreciate some advice how to model this please. This is the model file for reference.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance for your help.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 09:46:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/simply-supported-slabs-and-beams-one-way-vs-two-way-behaviour-in/m-p/13967471#M85904</guid>
      <dc:creator>ashley_calleja0806</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-07T09:46:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simply Supported Slabs and Beams – One-Way vs Two-Way Behaviour in Robot</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/simply-supported-slabs-and-beams-one-way-vs-two-way-behaviour-in/m-p/13967655#M85906</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;To have slab results , you can not use simplified distribution of loads on calculation model. It has to be&amp;nbsp; analytic.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So that´s it , perfect beam results for one/two way slab only if using claddings.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Acceptable results can be achieved using orthotropic slabs as you already know&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 12:09:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/simply-supported-slabs-and-beams-one-way-vs-two-way-behaviour-in/m-p/13967655#M85906</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rafacascudo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-07T12:09:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simply Supported Slabs and Beams – One-Way vs Two-Way Behaviour in Robot</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/simply-supported-slabs-and-beams-one-way-vs-two-way-behaviour-in/m-p/13969009#M85912</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your response. So, to confirm my understanding: it is not possible to obtain both accurate simply supported slab results and simply supported beam behaviour within the same model?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 09:45:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/simply-supported-slabs-and-beams-one-way-vs-two-way-behaviour-in/m-p/13969009#M85912</guid>
      <dc:creator>ashley_calleja0806</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-08T09:45:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Simply Supported Slabs and Beams – One-Way vs Two-Way Behaviour in Robot</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/simply-supported-slabs-and-beams-one-way-vs-two-way-behaviour-in/m-p/13970969#M85929</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For one-way ,You can try Ortho +releases. Looks good to me&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Ortho+releases.jpg" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1609534iB50843F4D1F583A2/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Ortho+releases.jpg" alt="Ortho+releases.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 15:32:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/simply-supported-slabs-and-beams-one-way-vs-two-way-behaviour-in/m-p/13970969#M85929</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rafacascudo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-09T15:32:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

