<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: AS4100 clause 8.4.2.2 in Robot Structural Analysis Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/as4100-clause-8-4-2-2/m-p/3465380#M82517</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Tony,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. ke value from 8.2.2.2&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What is currently done: Robot takes(if entered manually) or&amp;nbsp;caculates (based on stiffness of elements from the&amp;nbsp;top and bottom nodes) value of ke in the buckling check part as decribed in 4.6.3. This value can be below 1 (braced frame) or above 1 (sway frame). Then this ke value is compared with ke=1 and the larger value is used for Nc calculations&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What I think should be done is:&amp;nbsp;Robot takes(if entered manually) or&amp;nbsp;caculates (based on stiffness of elements from the&amp;nbsp;top and bottom nodes) value of ke in the buckling check part as decribed in 4.6.3. This value can be below 1 (braced frame) or above 1 (sway frame). Then this ke value is compared with ke=1 and the&amp;nbsp;smaller value is used for Nc calculations&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Am I correct?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Mi&lt;STRONG&gt;z&lt;/STRONG&gt; INCORRECTLY uses Nc&lt;STRONG&gt;y&lt;/STRONG&gt; as well, instead of Nc&lt;STRONG&gt;z&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think that Ncz (not Ncy) is (corerctly) used. Are you able to create the test model where you can see this issue?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:47:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Artur.Kosakowski</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-05-21T10:47:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AS4100 clause 8.4.2.2</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/as4100-clause-8-4-2-2/m-p/3463586#M82514</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Artur,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The formula for Mi in clause 8.4.2.2. (in plane capacity)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mi = Ms(1- N*/phiNc)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe Robot correctly calculates Mi&lt;STRONG&gt;y&lt;/STRONG&gt; (using the value of phiNc&lt;STRONG&gt;y&lt;/STRONG&gt;), but when calculating Mi&lt;STRONG&gt;z&lt;/STRONG&gt; it INCORRECTLY uses Nc&lt;STRONG&gt;y&lt;/STRONG&gt; as well, instead of Nc&lt;STRONG&gt;z&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please can you confirm this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tony&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 15:53:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/as4100-clause-8-4-2-2/m-p/3463586#M82514</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-18T15:53:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AS4100 clause 8.4.2.2</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/as4100-clause-8-4-2-2/m-p/3465220#M82515</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Tony,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Could you send me some test model that illustrates this situation and indicate what you think is wrong&amp;nbsp;please? It would be much easier for me as AS4100 is not the code I'm familiar with. Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 06:35:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/as4100-clause-8-4-2-2/m-p/3465220#M82515</guid>
      <dc:creator>Artur.Kosakowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-21T06:35:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AS4100 clause 8.4.2.2</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/as4100-clause-8-4-2-2/m-p/3465242#M82516</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Attached.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, please check clause 8.4.2.2. Ke for this clause should be set at no greater than 1.0 to calculate Nc, Robot instead uses Ke as defined (i.e. 1.2, 2.2 etc)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 07:14:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/as4100-clause-8-4-2-2/m-p/3465242#M82516</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-21T07:14:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AS4100 clause 8.4.2.2</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/as4100-clause-8-4-2-2/m-p/3465380#M82517</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Tony,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1. ke value from 8.2.2.2&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What is currently done: Robot takes(if entered manually) or&amp;nbsp;caculates (based on stiffness of elements from the&amp;nbsp;top and bottom nodes) value of ke in the buckling check part as decribed in 4.6.3. This value can be below 1 (braced frame) or above 1 (sway frame). Then this ke value is compared with ke=1 and the larger value is used for Nc calculations&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What I think should be done is:&amp;nbsp;Robot takes(if entered manually) or&amp;nbsp;caculates (based on stiffness of elements from the&amp;nbsp;top and bottom nodes) value of ke in the buckling check part as decribed in 4.6.3. This value can be below 1 (braced frame) or above 1 (sway frame). Then this ke value is compared with ke=1 and the&amp;nbsp;smaller value is used for Nc calculations&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Am I correct?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Mi&lt;STRONG&gt;z&lt;/STRONG&gt; INCORRECTLY uses Nc&lt;STRONG&gt;y&lt;/STRONG&gt; as well, instead of Nc&lt;STRONG&gt;z&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think that Ncz (not Ncy) is (corerctly) used. Are you able to create the test model where you can see this issue?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 10:47:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/as4100-clause-8-4-2-2/m-p/3465380#M82517</guid>
      <dc:creator>Artur.Kosakowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-21T10:47:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AS4100 clause 8.4.2.2</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/as4100-clause-8-4-2-2/m-p/3465402#M82518</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Artur,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For point 1;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes you are correct. &amp;nbsp;Ke should be 1.0 or less than 1.0, - &lt;STRONG&gt;as long as...............&amp;nbsp;In pure compression, N*/phiNc &amp;lt; 1.0 with Ke set as the actual value calculated in 4.6.3. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For Point 2:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry, the model I sent you had the column broken into two parts. &amp;nbsp;It should be 8m long. &amp;nbsp;Anyway, for the 8m long column, the results below show that Robot is using the wrong NC for calculation of phiMiz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG border="0" align="center" title="Doc1.jpg" alt="Doc1.jpg" src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/28956i80DB47BA43E40B87/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tony&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:12:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/as4100-clause-8-4-2-2/m-p/3465402#M82518</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-21T11:12:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AS4100 clause 8.4.2.2</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/as4100-clause-8-4-2-2/m-p/3465422#M82519</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Tony,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Please send me the file you used to generated the calculation report from your last answer. Trying to edit the previous file I'm getting different values. Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:42:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/as4100-clause-8-4-2-2/m-p/3465422#M82519</guid>
      <dc:creator>Artur.Kosakowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-21T11:42:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AS4100 clause 8.4.2.2</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/as4100-clause-8-4-2-2/m-p/3465448#M82520</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 11:58:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/as4100-clause-8-4-2-2/m-p/3465448#M82520</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-05-21T11:58:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

