topic Re: User defined member stability check in Robot Structural Analysis Forum

User defined member stability check

andgalb — Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:22:07 GMT

I have created a member in section builder to represent lost section due to corrosion. The steel design carries out the SECTION CHECK but not the MEMBER STABILITY CHECK. This is therefore giving me a lower ratio for the corroded member (0.22) than the uncorroded member (0.26). How do I check the stability of the member?

Thanks

Andrew

Re: User defined member stability check

Artur.Kosakowski — Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:52:14 GMT

Have you assigned this section the I symbol saving it to the user database?

Re: User defined member stability check

andgalb — Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:08:12 GMT

Hi Artur

When I select an I section it requires new dimensions to be inserted in the "Saving Section to Database" which only allows me to insert one thickness for both flanges. I'm assuming that I have to make both flanges the thickness of the corroded lower flange?

Re: User defined member stability check

StefanoPasquini6790 — Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:18:07 GMT

Hi,

why don't you use this kind of section:

This can solve your issue.

Greetings

Re: User defined member stability check

Artur.Kosakowski — Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:37:10 GMT

That would be one of the options but I think that the approach suggested by StefanoPasquini6790 may be a better one

In case you want to have such section in the user sectiion database you should edit its properties in the section database browser and change is type to 95. See the pdf from the post 11 from http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis/how-to-create-thin-walled-sections/td-p/3107002

If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.

Re: User defined member stability check

andgalb — Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:52:29 GMT

Thanks Gents that has done the trick.

Re: User defined member stability check

Anonymous — Mon, 30 Jul 2018 08:24:46 GMT

HI ARTHUR,

KINDLY HELP ON THIS AS WELL. THANKS FOR THE USUAL SWIFT RESPONSE.