<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Section check not analized despite getting forces?? in Robot Structural Analysis Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5504694#M68714</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Ay and &amp;nbsp;Az being 0s when you have shear forces. Try to save this section in the user section database with C shape type or edit these areas&amp;nbsp;entering some values.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BTW: if you ryun manual check for axial force and bending (shears as )s you will get the results).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/153793iD64E65DC51F3938A/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="verif no shear.PNG" title="verif no shear.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:30:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Artur.Kosakowski</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-02-12T12:30:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Section check not analized despite getting forces??</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5504675#M68713</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't understand why robot doesn't analize the members. I get some warnings of instablities but robot runs the calculations.&amp;nbsp;The moments diagrams and deformations are the expected ones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to simulate a 2span beam supported in shorts arms. Like a facade purlins.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Purlins are&amp;nbsp;user section database of less than 3mm. (I Already know the program doesn't run a thin walled section check for users sections. But I just want&amp;nbsp;to check as a normal section in elastic field (class 3).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whats going on?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:59:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5504675#M68713</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-12T11:59:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Section check not analized despite getting forces??</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5504694#M68714</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ay and &amp;nbsp;Az being 0s when you have shear forces. Try to save this section in the user section database with C shape type or edit these areas&amp;nbsp;entering some values.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;BTW: if you ryun manual check for axial force and bending (shears as )s you will get the results).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/153793iD64E65DC51F3938A/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="verif no shear.PNG" title="verif no shear.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:30:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5504694#M68714</guid>
      <dc:creator>Artur.Kosakowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-12T12:30:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Section check not analized despite getting forces??</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5504976#M68715</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;I am aware that Ay and Az are 0. But I believe that is not the issue.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Try to delete all the releases and you will find out that then robot makes the checks (also without shear áreas).&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:39:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5504976#M68715</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-12T15:39:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Section check not analized despite getting forces??</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5506110#M68716</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The difference is not the lack of releases but the presence of axial force. IMHO the check&amp;nbsp;of section defined in this way (without assigned section type and some parameters missing e.g. thickness&amp;nbsp;of web, flanges&amp;nbsp;etc.) could only be done for pure&amp;nbsp;tension (axial force) as FX/AX compared to resistance.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You may consider one of these&amp;nbsp;two solutions:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- save this section in the user database in&amp;nbsp;one of the ways described below:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/robot-structural-analysis-products/troubleshooting/caas/sfdcarticles/sfdcarticles/ROBOT-STEEL-DESIGN-how-design-user-defined-thin-walled-section.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/robot-structural-analysis-products/troubleshooting/caas/sfdcarticles/sfdcarticles/ROBOT-STEEL-DESIGN-how-design-user-defined-thin-walled-section.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/robot-structural-analysis-products/troubleshooting/caas/sfdcarticles/sfdcarticles/Robot-Steel-Design-How-to-code-check-a-member-of-Z-or-Sigma-shaped-thin-wall-section-according-part-3-of-code-NF-EN-1993-1.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://knowledge.autodesk.com/support/robot-structural-analysis-products/troubleshooting/caas/sfdcarticles/sfdcarticles/Robot-Steel-Design-How-to-code-check-a-member-of-Z-or-Sigma-shaped-thin-wall-section-according-part-3-of-code-NF-EN-1993-1.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- define section by properties and assign it the type using these dialogs&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/153954i14D90CB79877E2F1/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="sections by properties.PNG" title="sections by properties.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:16:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5506110#M68716</guid>
      <dc:creator>Artur.Kosakowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-13T10:16:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Section check not analized despite getting forces??</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5506210#M68717</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;Definitely the axial load plays a role here. (please&amp;nbsp;have a look to&amp;nbsp;the attached example).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When an axial load is applied, robot makes the verification, when there is no axial load don't. (with the same section as before, without shear áreas and other section properties).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It doesn't make sense to me.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:23:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5506210#M68717</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-13T12:23:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Section check not analized despite getting forces??</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5506347#M68718</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That's what I tried to explain &amp;nbsp;&lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://forums.autodesk.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;My point is that for section which is defined "incorrectly" in a sense that it hasn't got all the parameters required by the Steel design module the verification may be done incorrectly (e.g. C shape verified with formulas&amp;nbsp;that are not intended for C shape) and the only "reasonable" check is for pure tension. The recommend workflow is to define a section in a way it is expected by the steel design module.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:09:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5506347#M68718</guid>
      <dc:creator>Artur.Kosakowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-13T14:09:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Section check not analized despite getting forces??</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5506404#M68719</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've just realised that the gamma of the bar is&amp;nbsp;involved in this issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the attached file, I reach the conclusion that: robot doesn't perform the member check when the bar has bending moment in z axis (weak) and there is no axial load.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To me totally non sense.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:34:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5506404#M68719</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-13T14:34:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Section check not analized despite getting forces??</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5506414#M68720</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please attach&amp;nbsp;your user section&amp;nbsp;database with this profile.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:41:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5506414#M68720</guid>
      <dc:creator>Artur.Kosakowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-13T14:41:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Section check not analized despite getting forces??</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5508722#M68721</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;I sent you the database privately.&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:48:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5508722#M68721</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-16T16:48:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Section check not analized despite getting forces??</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5509527#M68722</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;IFRAME src="https://screencast.autodesk.com/Embed/e5bf7277-8909-4b6e-9331-fbf43a1675a6" width="696" height="435" frameborder="0"&gt;&lt;/IFRAME&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2015 10:20:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/section-check-not-analized-despite-getting-forces/m-p/5509527#M68722</guid>
      <dc:creator>Artur.Kosakowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-17T10:20:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

