<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Concentrated slab results in Robot Structural Analysis Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/concentrated-slab-results/m-p/5568352#M66738</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have some questions about high concentrated internal forces of slabs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Background information:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm designing a concrete bridge deck in transverse direction.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The deck is modeled of 12 slab elements with varying thicknesses (&lt;STRONG&gt;capture_1.jpg&lt;/STRONG&gt;). Pinned linear supports are placed at the locations of longitudinal steel girders.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Problem description:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you can see, there are extremely high Qyy values at the beginning of the slab when the vehicles are placed at the beginning of it, see (&lt;STRONG&gt;Qyy_1.jpg&lt;/STRONG&gt;). The high Qyy values do not seem right at all. &amp;nbsp;When the vehicles are placed further away, the Qyy values are more reasonable, see (&lt;STRONG&gt;Qyy_2.jpg&lt;/STRONG&gt;).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Myy values at the beginning of the slab, when the vehicle is placed at the beginning, are also larger than they are further away, see (&lt;STRONG&gt;Myy_2&lt;/STRONG&gt;)&amp;nbsp;and (&lt;STRONG&gt;Myy_3&lt;/STRONG&gt;). This could be explained with small area for load distribution at the beginning of the slab. But on the other hand very high Qyy values may indicate&amp;nbsp;that distribution of loads is not totally correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Myy_2&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG border="0" alt="Myy_2.JPG" src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/161671iDED14965EEC05A7E/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" title="Myy_2.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;Myy_3&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;IMG border="0" alt="Myy_3.JPG" src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/161672i65F80FECFB2C0936/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" title="Myy_3.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Different mesh sizes have been tested. Results remained the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How to avoid the extreme Qyy values?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to correct the model somehow to get reasonable results?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can the extreme values just be neglected?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are the Myy values correct even though the Qyy values are not?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2015 11:04:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-04-02T11:04:42Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

