<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Load distribution is ignoring mass and weight coefficient for orthotropic thicknesses in Robot Structural Analysis Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/load-distribution-is-ignoring-mass-and-weight-coefficient-for/m-p/11964500#M6425</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/12982947"&gt;@mmaso64U7Y&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;kindly attach the file.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 13:01:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JohanDuPlessis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-05-15T13:01:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Load distribution is ignoring mass and weight coefficient for orthotropic thicknesses</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/load-distribution-is-ignoring-mass-and-weight-coefficient-for/m-p/11949287#M6424</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;See the image below. Both panels have the same thickness with a weight modification coefficient of 1e-4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The left one has load distribution with FE. The right one, two-way distribution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The results should be the same, but the two way load distribution is ignoring the weight coefficient.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="mmaso64U7Y_0-1683557295696.png" style="width: 600px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1211817i77EDA75C389FD7A2/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="mmaso64U7Y_0-1683557295696.png" alt="mmaso64U7Y_0-1683557295696.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Robot Structural Analysis Professional 2022.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2023 14:57:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/load-distribution-is-ignoring-mass-and-weight-coefficient-for/m-p/11949287#M6424</guid>
      <dc:creator>mmaso64U7Y</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-08T14:57:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load distribution is ignoring mass and weight coefficient for orthotropic thicknesses</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/load-distribution-is-ignoring-mass-and-weight-coefficient-for/m-p/11964500#M6425</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/12982947"&gt;@mmaso64U7Y&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;kindly attach the file.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2023 13:01:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/load-distribution-is-ignoring-mass-and-weight-coefficient-for/m-p/11964500#M6425</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohanDuPlessis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-15T13:01:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load distribution is ignoring mass and weight coefficient for orthotropic thicknesses</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/load-distribution-is-ignoring-mass-and-weight-coefficient-for/m-p/11966683#M6426</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/9090842"&gt;@JohanDuPlessis&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;, find attached the file in this &lt;A href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/j0ffwk16rghxvwa/Thickness%20mass.rtd?dl=0" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;link&lt;/A&gt;. I couldn't attach the file in this post. Thanks for your attention.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="mmaso64U7Y_0-1684222922638.png" style="width: 600px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/1214932iAB39B74DF81773C6/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="mmaso64U7Y_0-1684222922638.png" alt="mmaso64U7Y_0-1684222922638.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 08:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/load-distribution-is-ignoring-mass-and-weight-coefficient-for/m-p/11966683#M6426</guid>
      <dc:creator>mmaso64U7Y</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-16T08:34:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load distribution is ignoring mass and weight coefficient for orthotropic thicknesses</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/load-distribution-is-ignoring-mass-and-weight-coefficient-for/m-p/11967002#M6427</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You have to zip it before attaching&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 10:52:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/load-distribution-is-ignoring-mass-and-weight-coefficient-for/m-p/11967002#M6427</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rafacascudo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-16T10:52:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Load distribution is ignoring mass and weight coefficient for orthotropic thicknesses</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/load-distribution-is-ignoring-mass-and-weight-coefficient-for/m-p/11967209#M6428</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the hint&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2023 12:19:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/load-distribution-is-ignoring-mass-and-weight-coefficient-for/m-p/11967209#M6428</guid>
      <dc:creator>mmaso64U7Y</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-05-16T12:19:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

