<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Continuous purlins and girts with rigid links in Robot Structural Analysis Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/continuous-purlins-and-girts-with-rigid-links/m-p/5949779#M58736</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You may want to consider use of&amp;nbsp;compatible nodes:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis/compatible-nodes/m-p/3689964/" target="_blank"&gt;http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis/compatible-nodes/m-p/3689964/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis/compatible-nodes/m-p/3797147/" target="_blank"&gt;http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis/compatible-nodes/m-p/3797147/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:12:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Artur.Kosakowski</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-12-14T08:12:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Continuous purlins and girts with rigid links</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/continuous-purlins-and-girts-with-rigid-links/m-p/5949507#M58735</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a problem with my 3d model. I wanted to model purlins and girts as continuous beams and to make this happen I used rigid links.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, another reason for using rigid links is independent roof bracing system which should not be mixed with purlin static system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/206418i3718FC06624F2BF7/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" alt="Figure-1.jpg" title="Figure-1.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/206419iD1E13F69B4932824/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" alt="Figure-2.jpg" title="Figure-2.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To achieve the static system of&amp;nbsp;continuous beam, I used end releases on bars and rigid link releases:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/206420i0ACF70A8325CAB2D/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" alt="Figure-4.jpg" title="Figure-4.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And RZ instability appears always in the end:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/206421i4176431F476E3519/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&amp;amp;px=-1" alt="Figure-3.jpg" title="Figure-3.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I tried many variations...changing bar releases, support types...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I remove girts, with purlins only remaining, there isn't any instability, it works fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But when I add girts, RZ instability appears somewhere.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ultimately I tried removing all bar releases (all fixed connections) and adding all fixed supports, but RZ instability still appears. That's why I suspect that there's something wrong with this modeling method &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":confused_face:"&gt;😕&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But despite this instability, results seem ok.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I attached my model, so if you could please check it out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or is there any other way to model continuous purlins and girts?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2015 23:24:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/continuous-purlins-and-girts-with-rigid-links/m-p/5949507#M58735</guid>
      <dc:creator>ptica1cro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-13T23:24:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Continuous purlins and girts with rigid links</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/continuous-purlins-and-girts-with-rigid-links/m-p/5949779#M58736</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You may want to consider use of&amp;nbsp;compatible nodes:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis/compatible-nodes/m-p/3689964/" target="_blank"&gt;http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis/compatible-nodes/m-p/3689964/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis/compatible-nodes/m-p/3797147/" target="_blank"&gt;http://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis/compatible-nodes/m-p/3797147/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;If you find your post answered press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solutions much faster. Thank you.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2015 08:12:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/continuous-purlins-and-girts-with-rigid-links/m-p/5949779#M58736</guid>
      <dc:creator>Artur.Kosakowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-14T08:12:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Continuous purlins and girts with rigid links</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/continuous-purlins-and-girts-with-rigid-links/m-p/5959994#M58737</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I solved this problem by replacing rigid links with dummy elements (manually created new cross-section with relatively high Ax,Ix,Iy,Iz, i.e. rigid) and modeling releases like in previous case with rigid links.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If someone stumbles upon a problem like this, don't forget to remove self-weight from dummy elements. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2015 08:21:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/continuous-purlins-and-girts-with-rigid-links/m-p/5959994#M58737</guid>
      <dc:creator>ptica1cro</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-21T08:21:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

