<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CAEP VS CAE buckling in Robot Structural Analysis Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/caep-vs-cae-buckling/m-p/8055582#M31961</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4194670"&gt;@JPNR87&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Assuming you don't use Robot what would you do for hand calculations?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 11:22:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Artur.Kosakowski</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-06-08T11:22:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CAEP VS CAE buckling</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/caep-vs-cae-buckling/m-p/8055549#M31960</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;as we know angle profiles CAE and CAEP have buckling directions difference (local axis).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have some one good view how to determine buckling bracing for those two types?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. For example with CAE profiles in my case buckling around y axis for chord is blocked. And this model looks fair&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="1.JPG" style="width: 588px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/509975i29EC7DAB27F3D7CD/image-dimensions/588x325?v=v2" width="588" height="325" role="button" title="1.JPG" alt="1.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Changing profiles to CAEP local axes are u-u and v-v. So I cant say that&amp;nbsp; along y nor Z&amp;nbsp; axis is blocked because it's somewhere in the "middle". I would say that for chords both directions are blocked in nodes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2.JPG" style="width: 565px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/509977i50608842D499A050/image-dimensions/565x305?v=v2" width="565" height="305" role="button" title="2.JPG" alt="2.JPG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="buckling restricting according to axis" style="width: 425px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/509978i24064B38256D4E49/image-dimensions/425x191?v=v2" width="425" height="191" role="button" title="3.JPG" alt="buckling restricting according to axis" /&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-caption" onclick="event.preventDefault();"&gt;buckling restricting according to axis&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have someone ideas to confirm or deny or to add something?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 11:03:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/caep-vs-cae-buckling/m-p/8055549#M31960</guid>
      <dc:creator>JPNR87</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-08T11:03:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CAEP VS CAE buckling</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/caep-vs-cae-buckling/m-p/8055582#M31961</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4194670"&gt;@JPNR87&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Assuming you don't use Robot what would you do for hand calculations?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 11:22:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/caep-vs-cae-buckling/m-p/8055582#M31961</guid>
      <dc:creator>Artur.Kosakowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-08T11:22:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CAEP VS CAE buckling</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/caep-vs-cae-buckling/m-p/8055612#M31962</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would say that for chord in nodes CAEP case along both directions buckling is blocked.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for answer&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 11:38:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/caep-vs-cae-buckling/m-p/8055612#M31962</guid>
      <dc:creator>JPNR87</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-08T11:38:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CAEP VS CAE buckling</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/caep-vs-cae-buckling/m-p/8055696#M31963</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4194670"&gt;@JPNR87&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On the contrary I'd assume the opposite. As IMHO the buckling out of the truss plane is not restrained at all it doesn't matter if there is any restrain in its plane as IY and IZ is the same. I can't see ant reason why under the compression the while truss not buckle in the vertical direction.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;If I managed to answer your question(s) press the Accept as Solution button please. This will help other users to find solution(s) much faster. Thank you.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 12:06:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/caep-vs-cae-buckling/m-p/8055696#M31963</guid>
      <dc:creator>Artur.Kosakowski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-06-08T12:06:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CAEP VS CAE buckling</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/caep-vs-cae-buckling/m-p/13220250#M31964</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry, I didn’t understand clearly&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, for bracing, should we use CAE or CAEP?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:15:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/caep-vs-cae-buckling/m-p/13220250#M31964</guid>
      <dc:creator>l_santos4EBSZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-19T12:15:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CAEP VS CAE buckling</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/caep-vs-cae-buckling/m-p/13222661#M31965</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/16438847"&gt;@l_santos4EBSZ&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;According to what was said in previous messages, each one has its own opinion.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To stay in security i would use CAEP for all angles section as soon as some bars would be in compresion.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;For parameters, I will use the biggest buckling length in local z direction of CAEP.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For bars in tension there is no difference between CAE an CAEP as buckling effect will not be taken into account by Robot .&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 16:23:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/caep-vs-cae-buckling/m-p/13222661#M31965</guid>
      <dc:creator>Simau</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-12-20T16:23:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

