<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Robot Vs. in Robot Structural Analysis Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/robot-vs/m-p/8787053#M24793</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Correct . This is now our sad and uncertain reality&lt;img id="smileyfrustrated" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyfrustrated" src="https://forums.autodesk.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-frustrated.png" alt="Smiley Frustrated" title="Smiley Frustrated" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 11:43:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rafacascudo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-05-13T11:43:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Robot Vs.</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/robot-vs/m-p/8785274#M24791</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;To Whom It May Concern,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have been looking at robot for some time as a potential replacement for the current structural modeling program we have. The interoperability between robot and revit/advance steel is much better than our current arrangement. The kickback that I get is that quote "It is not popular in the US". I'm wondering where and who uses Robot? How does it stack up against its competitors? Is that statement a true statement?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any help.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2019 20:06:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/robot-vs/m-p/8785274#M24791</guid>
      <dc:creator>chad.corkern</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-11T20:06:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Robot Vs.</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/robot-vs/m-p/8786776#M24792</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As you can see in this forum, all users are worried about the future of RSA, because it is not clear what Autodesk wants to do with RSA...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://blogs.autodesk.com/revit/2019/04/12/robot-structural-analysis-public-roadmap/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://blogs.autodesk.com/revit/2019/04/12/robot-structural-analysis-public-roadmap/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/learn-what-s-new-in-robot-structural-analysis-2020/td-p/8731383" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/learn-what-s-new-in-robot-structural-analysis-2020/td-p/8731383&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/upcoming-version-2020-2021-2022/m-p/8335180#M71666" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/upcoming-version-2020-2021-2022/m-p/8335180#M71666&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/save-our-rsa/td-p/7601162/page/12" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/save-our-rsa/td-p/7601162/page/12&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In this forum, we all love RSA , so it is a hard question to reply. I think it is used worlwide (i'm an European user) but i would say (without any data to support it, just my feeling) that US is not a market with a lot of users. Maybe i'm wrong and some other users can say the opposite (with true &lt;SPAN&gt;knowledge)&lt;/SPAN&gt;. If i were you (I think you posted this topic to get our true feelings), at this point, I would search for better alternatives, such as Sofistik (extensions to interact with revit) or SAP. It's hard to invest years of our working life in a software and not know if it will continue to be developed (in the proper way...) ...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 09:21:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/robot-vs/m-p/8786776#M24792</guid>
      <dc:creator>rsousa_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-13T09:21:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Robot Vs.</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/robot-vs/m-p/8787053#M24793</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Correct . This is now our sad and uncertain reality&lt;img id="smileyfrustrated" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyfrustrated" src="https://forums.autodesk.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-frustrated.png" alt="Smiley Frustrated" title="Smiley Frustrated" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 11:43:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/robot-vs/m-p/8787053#M24793</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rafacascudo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-13T11:43:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Robot Vs.</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/robot-vs/m-p/8787487#M24794</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5566451"&gt;@chad.corkern&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Have you looked into RISA? Apparently they have Revit interoperability. I'm just not sure how efficient it is. I have been using RSA for a while but it seems to be lacking many thing that RISA apparently covers. It (RISA) also is a convenient software for many North American users.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2019 14:04:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/robot-vs/m-p/8787487#M24794</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-13T14:04:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

