<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: First Seismic Analysis. Chek result. Slab foundation on winkler Springs. in Robot Structural Analysis Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/first-seismic-analysis-chek-result-slab-foundation-on-winkler/m-p/8988536#M23300</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Italy law is: DM2008.&lt;BR /&gt;the analysis sized 3.5Gb, so i can't attach it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 20:56:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>1584253</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-08-26T20:56:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>First Seismic Analysis. Chek result. Slab foundation on winkler Springs.</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/first-seismic-analysis-chek-result-slab-foundation-on-winkler/m-p/8986284#M23295</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi , I’m Italian student and this is my first model in this amazing software. Sorry for my english. I've lot of question, and glad to have your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Seismic analysis&lt;/STRONG&gt; (i don't count eccentricy in analysis to avoid an increase of analysis time):&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;Modes: much modes with low participating mass, so i can use 300 modes to reach 85% partecipating mass&lt;/STRONG&gt;, because of:&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Vertical action&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Mixt structure reinforced concrete wall + column steel&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is this observations right?&amp;nbsp; &lt;STRONG&gt;is it possible that a lumped mass matrix&amp;nbsp; it's a wrong model in this case?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Cases:&lt;/STRONG&gt; I create my SLE (SLS) and SLU (ULS) cases. But when i created Seismic Analysis, they appeared a lot of case that&amp;nbsp; i don't know and im not able to delete: SLE:CHR; SLE:FRE; SLE:QPR what's that?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Load to mass conversion:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; I converted load into mass. I didn't pin Disregard Density, and i dont' convert into dynamic mass DL (Dead Load) is it correct?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Plate Foundation on winkler springs:&lt;/STRONG&gt; I try to create a model with springs, but it too slow to work on it. So i prefered to use a fixed model, and analyze and rebar plate apart.&lt;BR /&gt;Now, how can i carry out stress and forces from column and Wall to my plate in another file to analyize my plate?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Plate Foundation Support&lt;/STRONG&gt;: when i applied Springs, i noticed that i can define and applied elastic coefficent (Kz) in two different screens, first: in Thickness definition i can apply my elastic coefficent. Then in Support i can define my springs with Kz coefficent. Should insert Kz in all of this?&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Aug 2019 17:11:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/first-seismic-analysis-chek-result-slab-foundation-on-winkler/m-p/8986284#M23295</guid>
      <dc:creator>1584253</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-25T17:11:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: First Seismic Analysis. Chek result. Slab foundation on winkler Springs.</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/first-seismic-analysis-chek-result-slab-foundation-on-winkler/m-p/8987371#M23296</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2396471"&gt;@1584253&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Each of the questions asked need a thread.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1) The vertical earthquake is mandotary only under certain conditions (according to the regulations). In average building Z direction is not taken into consideration and it is difficult to reach 85% for this direction.&lt;BR /&gt;Difficult to give an opinion on this point without a view of the structure.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;2) Case: how did you generate the combinations, manual, automatic?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;3) Load to mass conversion: Correct&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;4) Plate foundation: This thread may be useful &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/only-reaction-for-new-model-api/m-p/3659242" target="_blank"&gt;https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/only-reaction-for-new-model-api/m-p/3659242&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;5) Plate foundations: use one of both, not both at the same time&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 11:24:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/first-seismic-analysis-chek-result-slab-foundation-on-winkler/m-p/8987371#M23296</guid>
      <dc:creator>Simau</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-26T11:24:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: First Seismic Analysis. Chek result. Slab foundation on winkler Springs.</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/first-seismic-analysis-chek-result-slab-foundation-on-winkler/m-p/8987543#M23297</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry for a unique message, it's&amp;nbsp; for me important have a check about correct analysis and modelling. Next time i try to be more selective.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;1) It's a mandatory for me, because of long cantilever and structure hanged a trusses.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;I've attach my model.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2) I created manually ULS,SLS (SLE in my country). Then i've generated Seismic Analysis and it generate: Spectrum SLV,SLD in X,Y,Z Direction ecc.. and also it generate automatically Newmark combinations (Ex,Ey,Ez) but also generate strange combination like SLE:CHR SLE:FRE ecc..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;4) thanks!&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;5) Thanks!&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 12:51:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/first-seismic-analysis-chek-result-slab-foundation-on-winkler/m-p/8987543#M23297</guid>
      <dc:creator>1584253</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-26T12:51:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: First Seismic Analysis. Chek result. Slab foundation on winkler Springs.</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/first-seismic-analysis-chek-result-slab-foundation-on-winkler/m-p/8988315#M23298</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't know really why you need 60cm thickness for walls. I reduce it down to 25 cm, and reach 85% with only 118 modes. Model attached&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Could you send your model with sismique calculation?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="rules.jpg" style="width: 641px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/670950iFAB75805BBE26CB6/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="rules.jpg" alt="rules.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 18:57:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/first-seismic-analysis-chek-result-slab-foundation-on-winkler/m-p/8988315#M23298</guid>
      <dc:creator>Simau</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-26T18:57:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: First Seismic Analysis. Chek result. Slab foundation on winkler Springs.</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/first-seismic-analysis-chek-result-slab-foundation-on-winkler/m-p/8988382#M23299</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So, greater difference between stiffness more modes I have to counting to reach 85%?&amp;nbsp; Probably is it a&amp;nbsp; matter of stiffness matrix size?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The wall was sized with some hand calculation with static lateral equivalent forces. Is only a pre-sized.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ps: I'm exported&amp;nbsp; forces on raft with API which you introduced. Thanks a lot!&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 19:38:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/first-seismic-analysis-chek-result-slab-foundation-on-winkler/m-p/8988382#M23299</guid>
      <dc:creator>1584253</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-26T19:38:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: First Seismic Analysis. Chek result. Slab foundation on winkler Springs.</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/first-seismic-analysis-chek-result-slab-foundation-on-winkler/m-p/8988536#M23300</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Italy law is: DM2008.&lt;BR /&gt;the analysis sized 3.5Gb, so i can't attach it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 20:56:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/first-seismic-analysis-chek-result-slab-foundation-on-winkler/m-p/8988536#M23300</guid>
      <dc:creator>1584253</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-26T20:56:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

