topic Moving Load Envelopes missing in reactions table in Robot Structural Analysis Forum

Moving Load Envelopes missing in reactions table

Anonymous — Thu, 08 Apr 2021 13:03:06 GMT

I've got some moving loads in a model with fixed supports. The analysis run has created cases with + and - as well as combinations with + and -.

I am trying to extract all of the support reactions, however when I open the reactions table with the 'full table' option, the load cases with + and - are not included.

If I select these load cases and then use the 'table filtered to current selection' option then they are included in the reactions table, so there is data available.

Because of this I've missed out some data as I only used the 'full table' option. What is happening here please?

The combinations with + and - are not affected, they are present in the full table.

Thanks

Re: Moving Load Envelopes missing in reactions table

Krzysztof_Wasik — Thu, 08 Apr 2021 15:08:11 GMT

Hi @Anonymous

I have created simple test including dead load moving load and combination (dead + moving load)

When I opened reaction table all cases are visible in selection tool. Could you please describe problem with more details.

Re: Moving Load Envelopes missing in reactions table

Anonymous — Thu, 08 Apr 2021 15:19:55 GMT

Hi @Krzysztof_Wasik, thanks for looking at this.

When I use 'table filtered to current selection' the load case is there ✔️

When I use 'full table' the load case is not there 😑

It looks like the 'full table' selects all of the load cases/combinations except for the + and - load cases, which means I am missing values from my 'full' table. I can still find the values now that I know about it, but I don't know why it would be missing from the full table to start with.

Thanks

Re: Moving Load Envelopes missing in reactions table

Krzysztof_Wasik — Thu, 08 Apr 2021 16:13:30 GMT

Hi @Anonymous

You are right. There is simple workaround . Type ALL in case selection field after reaction table opening.

Re: Moving Load Envelopes missing in reactions table

Anonymous — Wed, 14 Apr 2021 07:40:37 GMT

thanks