<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Tapered Section in Robot Structural Analysis Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/tapered-section/m-p/10643602#M13162</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Statically, there is no difference. ,only graphically it is a bit weird. But you can use offsets if you need to consider vertical excentricity .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 20:47:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rafacascudo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-09-23T20:47:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Tapered Section</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/tapered-section/m-p/10642603#M13158</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to have a tapered RC Beam on one side only. Anybody who can help me to do it(really appreciate it).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 14:27:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/tapered-section/m-p/10642603#M13158</guid>
      <dc:creator>saclovitzky</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-23T14:27:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Tapered Section</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/tapered-section/m-p/10642751#M13159</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;@Anonymouswasik any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 15:06:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/tapered-section/m-p/10642751#M13159</guid>
      <dc:creator>saclovitzky</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-23T15:06:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Tapered Section</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/tapered-section/m-p/10642769#M13160</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What do you mean by "&lt;SPAN&gt;tapered on one side only"?&amp;nbsp; Can you attach a picture?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 15:11:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/tapered-section/m-p/10642769#M13160</guid>
      <dc:creator>okapawal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-23T15:11:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Tapered Section</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/tapered-section/m-p/10642974#M13161</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please see "no 2" diagram, at the moment ARSAP can only do "no.1" diagram when you choose tapered&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:17:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/tapered-section/m-p/10642974#M13161</guid>
      <dc:creator>saclovitzky</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-23T16:17:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Tapered Section</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/tapered-section/m-p/10643602#M13162</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Statically, there is no difference. ,only graphically it is a bit weird. But you can use offsets if you need to consider vertical excentricity .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 20:47:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/robot-structural-analysis-forum/tapered-section/m-p/10643602#M13162</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rafacascudo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-09-23T20:47:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

