<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotation in Revit Architecture Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7744460#M245877</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Guess what ? Those pretty sheets of drawings are what is used to actually build a building. We're not building a model we're building documents than can give direction to another entity to build a building. That is the goal, that is the destination. That's what this software should support first and foremost, at least for some of us.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That is because there weren't any better means to instruct how to put together a building.&amp;nbsp; It's like if I got pulled over by a cop (because I decided to let her), I would need to show her pieces of paper.&amp;nbsp; Now I would just call up an app on the phone and be on my merry way.&amp;nbsp; I expect they won't even need to pull people over no more in the future.&amp;nbsp; Things change.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 19:55:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ToanDN</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-02-01T19:55:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotations</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7741516#M245858</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Revit can do so much, yet it never seems to close the deal.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Whatever graphic representation of the model used or added annotations, it never creates a complete quality graphic drawings in somewhat of a straightforward manner.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;The last 10-15% always requires enhancement, lies, cheating, or work-arounds.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;So tired of trouble-shooting !&amp;nbsp; I sure would like to be productive in my work.&amp;nbsp; This is a constant fight.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 23:43:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7741516#M245858</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-31T23:43:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7741604#M245859</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dude,&amp;nbsp;having one of "those" days; huh? Been there before. I feel your pain. What is it today; &lt;U&gt;specifically&lt;/U&gt;? Maybe we can help?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 01:01:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7741604#M245859</guid>
      <dc:creator>barthbradley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T01:01:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7741621#M245860</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You're complaining about 10 - 15%? That should be a compliment!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 01:21:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7741621#M245860</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobDraw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T01:21:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7742379#M245861</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;......to stop you getting complacent &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 10:05:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7742379#M245861</guid>
      <dc:creator>bimscape</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T10:05:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7743028#M245862</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If CAD software made things TOO easy, then drafting would be lower paying work that anyone could do. Revit idiosyncrasies provides you job security!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 13:46:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7743028#M245862</guid>
      <dc:creator>chrisplyler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T13:46:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7743610#M245863</link>
      <description>If that's the way Autodesk and it's programmers looks at the situation then that certainly explains why we are where we are. If my car only gets me 85-90% of the way there it doesn't do me much good if I have to get out and push.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 15:58:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7743610#M245863</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T15:58:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7743703#M245864</link>
      <description>Wrong. AutoDesk has never claimed Revit to be a complete, ready to go package. How do you think they could anticipate every variation of standards and work flows? It can take years for a company to go from ground zero to fully implementing Revit.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 16:21:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7743703#M245864</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobDraw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T16:21:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7743717#M245865</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;@Anonymous: You still haven't explained&amp;nbsp;the specifics of your issue. It might not be software-related at all.&amp;nbsp;Maybe it's&amp;nbsp;hardware-related&amp;nbsp;-- or maybe you are just a bad driver.&amp;nbsp; In any case, we can't help you complain.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;...BTW: if the car runs out of gas; is that the car's fault?&amp;nbsp;&lt;img id="smileywink" class="emoticon emoticon-smileywink" src="https://forums.autodesk.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-wink.png" alt="Smiley Wink" title="Smiley Wink" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 16:40:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7743717#M245865</guid>
      <dc:creator>barthbradley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T16:40:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7743946#M245866</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;If my car only gets me 85-90% of the way there it doesn't do me much good if I have to get out and push.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Even a car requires you to put something in it, like fuel! SMH&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 17:28:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7743946#M245866</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobDraw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T17:28:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7743948#M245867</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;If my car only gets me 85-90% of the way there it doesn't do me much good if I have to get out and push.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Compared to walking the whole way? I think 85% of the way is pretty good. And that last 15%? That's good exercise!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 17:28:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7743948#M245867</guid>
      <dc:creator>chrisplyler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T17:28:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7743993#M245868</link>
      <description>@Anonymous&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Revit wasn't created to be a tool to produce pretty sheets of drawings for blueprints.  It will never be.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Consider you get to the 90% in 1/2 or less the time to take the other guys, setup a road trap to block them, get a Uber to bring  you the 100%. And you are still faster than them.  What is the trap and what is the Uber are up to one's creativity.  Some don't have any.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 17:40:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7743993#M245868</guid>
      <dc:creator>ToanDN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T17:40:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7744034#M245869</link>
      <description>Guess what ? Those pretty sheets of drawings are what is used to actually build a building. We're not building a model we're building documents than can give direction to another entity to build a building. That is the goal, that is the destination. That's what this software should support first and foremost, at least for some of us.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 17:50:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7744034#M245869</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T17:50:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7744088#M245870</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You may be using the wrong tool for the job.&amp;nbsp; Revit is top-down, allowing management of vast amounts of data to support large projects.&amp;nbsp; It's not intended to work on nuts and bolts (figuratively or literally).&amp;nbsp; And those who are building the nuts-and-bolts end don't care about the entire project, just the boxes they are creating for it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Going with the much-abused vehicle metaphor, you need both a screwdriver *and* a crane.&amp;nbsp; You're not going to use a crane to build a rooftop HVAC unit.&amp;nbsp; You need hand tools, welders, and&amp;nbsp;possibly some programming for more modern units.&amp;nbsp; Once it gets to site, you need a different set of tools and a different set of workers.&amp;nbsp; It's a "box, HVAC, rooftop" with a couple of connections to bolt it down to the building plus utility connections - what type of screws it uses don't matter one whit.&amp;nbsp; That welder and screwdriver aren't going to get it onto the building, nor hook it up to the utilities.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Right tool, for the right job.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 18:08:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7744088#M245870</guid>
      <dc:creator>dgorsman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T18:08:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7744098#M245871</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;We're not building a model we're building documents than can give direction to another entity to build a building.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Doesn't sound like you are doing either. Sounds like you are whining. I wouldn't hire you. Sorry.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;P.S.&amp;nbsp;Please feel free to mark this as the accepted solution.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 18:13:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7744098#M245871</guid>
      <dc:creator>barthbradley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T18:13:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7744108#M245872</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Guess what ? Those pretty sheets of drawings are what is used to actually build a building. We're not building a model we're building documents than can give direction to another entity to build a building. That is the goal, that is the destination. That's what this software should support first and foremost, at least for some of us.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Revit is not a drafting program. If that is what your after, I doubt you could find one that OOTB would get you any closer than 85-90% there on your documentation standards. I think you are expecting WAY too much!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 18:12:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7744108#M245872</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobDraw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T18:12:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7744148#M245873</link>
      <description>I am very much whining ! and thanks, I have a job.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 18:25:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7744148#M245873</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T18:25:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7744170#M245874</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;I am very much whining ! and thanks, I have a job.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;...and how's that job working out for you? Just saying...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 18:30:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7744170#M245874</guid>
      <dc:creator>barthbradley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T18:30:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7744283#M245875</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you'll describe that last ten to fifteen percent that you're missing - as regards producing documentation that gets the job done - we may be able to tell you how to keep the car running all the way to the destination.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I produce construction drawings for my company, and they get the job done quite well. I don't feel that Revit leaves me stranded on the side of the road.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 19:06:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7744283#M245875</guid>
      <dc:creator>chrisplyler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T19:06:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7744320#M245876</link>
      <description>I appreciate that. OK, here's one struggle. My gridlines bubbles periodically get all screwed up, don't know why. When I investigate the problematic ones, they seem to all have reverted back to 3D mode, even though I had explicitly went view by view, changing them all to 2D at both ends to maintain the specific view setup. I have made no modifications to gridines (that I was aware of) that should lead to this. It happens too often. Pinning and locking doesn't seem to make a difference. How can I keep the grids, alignment and bubles from changing once they have been set. I am the only one working on the project. I'd appreciate your opinion.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 19:20:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7744320#M245876</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T19:20:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Revit only get 85-90% the way there w/ typical graphics/ annotation</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7744460#M245877</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;Guess what ? Those pretty sheets of drawings are what is used to actually build a building. We're not building a model we're building documents than can give direction to another entity to build a building. That is the goal, that is the destination. That's what this software should support first and foremost, at least for some of us.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That is because there weren't any better means to instruct how to put together a building.&amp;nbsp; It's like if I got pulled over by a cop (because I decided to let her), I would need to show her pieces of paper.&amp;nbsp; Now I would just call up an app on the phone and be on my merry way.&amp;nbsp; I expect they won't even need to pull people over no more in the future.&amp;nbsp; Things change.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2018 19:55:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/why-does-revit-only-get-85-90-the-way-there-w-typical-graphics/m-p/7744460#M245877</guid>
      <dc:creator>ToanDN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-01T19:55:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

