<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic IFC option &amp;quot;export links as separate models&amp;quot; causes wrong placement in Solibri in Revit Architecture Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/ifc-option-quot-export-links-as-separate-models-quot-causes/m-p/9458577#M149283</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok, so I need a real expert here I think, and I´ll try to be detailed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a housing project, with 4 housetypes. Each type exists up to 30 times in the project, usually put together in rows af 6-8. Each type is modelled within it´s own Revit file. These 4 files does not contain a shared coordinate system, but has simply been modelled on top of a masterplan CAD file, showing the footprint of all house instances across all 4 types. This footprint file is a link (manual center), and has been placed in the same location, in each of the 4 type files, before any modeling took place. I randomly chose a "starting position" for each house type, within the allotted footprint types, meaning for example, that of the 30 footprints for house type A, I picked a random one, and modeled type A there. These 4 files were then linked (with origin2origin I believe), into an aggregate model, also containing the footprint file at the same location as the 4 type files. I used origin2origin here, because the original instance of the 4 typefiles would then be placed correctly within an allotted footprint, in the aggregate model. I then proceed to copy the 4 links onto all the footprints shown in the master CAD. Now, after having done this there were multiple changes to the placements of the links, meaning in a row of 6 type A houses, I might have deleted 5 of them, rotated and moved the last one to the new location (anywhere from 0,1 to 2 meters, and rotated maybe 1-2 degrees), and then copy it 5 more times to get the entire row of 6 in the new correct position.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is what´s happening to me, that I don´t understand. When I export the aggregated model to IFC using the "Export linked files as separate IFC" option, and then open all 60+ ifc files in Solibri model viever, all the links seems to be placed correct, except for the 4 originally placed instances of each house type. So, it seems that these 4 instances are somehow exported in an earlier position, than the rest.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bonus info. The master CAD file contains the projects shared coordinates. I believe, that after copying the links, creating the first version of the aggregated model, I then acquired those coordinates (not in the 4 type files, only in the aggregated model). I then later proceeded to move/delete/copy the links again to their new position (I did not re-link the type files, only move/copy or delete them). In my own understanding of shared sites/coordinates this should not cause problems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone explain what is happening here? I have attached an image of the aggregated IFC model to show how the original linked type A and B houses a placed wrong. The original linked type C and D are also displaced, but it´s not visible as they are not in rows. Also attached my IFC export settings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Things I tried: unchecking "include IFC site", just because.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:36:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dg</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-04-21T10:36:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>IFC option "export links as separate models" causes wrong placement in Solibri</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/ifc-option-quot-export-links-as-separate-models-quot-causes/m-p/9458577#M149283</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok, so I need a real expert here I think, and I´ll try to be detailed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a housing project, with 4 housetypes. Each type exists up to 30 times in the project, usually put together in rows af 6-8. Each type is modelled within it´s own Revit file. These 4 files does not contain a shared coordinate system, but has simply been modelled on top of a masterplan CAD file, showing the footprint of all house instances across all 4 types. This footprint file is a link (manual center), and has been placed in the same location, in each of the 4 type files, before any modeling took place. I randomly chose a "starting position" for each house type, within the allotted footprint types, meaning for example, that of the 30 footprints for house type A, I picked a random one, and modeled type A there. These 4 files were then linked (with origin2origin I believe), into an aggregate model, also containing the footprint file at the same location as the 4 type files. I used origin2origin here, because the original instance of the 4 typefiles would then be placed correctly within an allotted footprint, in the aggregate model. I then proceed to copy the 4 links onto all the footprints shown in the master CAD. Now, after having done this there were multiple changes to the placements of the links, meaning in a row of 6 type A houses, I might have deleted 5 of them, rotated and moved the last one to the new location (anywhere from 0,1 to 2 meters, and rotated maybe 1-2 degrees), and then copy it 5 more times to get the entire row of 6 in the new correct position.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is what´s happening to me, that I don´t understand. When I export the aggregated model to IFC using the "Export linked files as separate IFC" option, and then open all 60+ ifc files in Solibri model viever, all the links seems to be placed correct, except for the 4 originally placed instances of each house type. So, it seems that these 4 instances are somehow exported in an earlier position, than the rest.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bonus info. The master CAD file contains the projects shared coordinates. I believe, that after copying the links, creating the first version of the aggregated model, I then acquired those coordinates (not in the 4 type files, only in the aggregated model). I then later proceeded to move/delete/copy the links again to their new position (I did not re-link the type files, only move/copy or delete them). In my own understanding of shared sites/coordinates this should not cause problems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone explain what is happening here? I have attached an image of the aggregated IFC model to show how the original linked type A and B houses a placed wrong. The original linked type C and D are also displaced, but it´s not visible as they are not in rows. Also attached my IFC export settings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Things I tried: unchecking "include IFC site", just because.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 10:36:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/ifc-option-quot-export-links-as-separate-models-quot-causes/m-p/9458577#M149283</guid>
      <dc:creator>dg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-21T10:36:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IFC option "export links as separate models" causes wrong placemen</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/ifc-option-quot-export-links-as-separate-models-quot-causes/m-p/9492372#M149284</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4559922"&gt;@dg&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am afraid without files it will be hard to investigate.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Check the same in Navisworks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If it is not correct It would be good to send me or post all revit files You use in project.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 08:29:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/ifc-option-quot-export-links-as-separate-models-quot-causes/m-p/9492372#M149284</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rafal.Gaweda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-05T08:29:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: IFC option "export links as separate models" causes wrong placemen</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/ifc-option-quot-export-links-as-separate-models-quot-causes/m-p/9493334#M149285</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4559922"&gt;@dg&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the files.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have escalated this issue to dvlp team for further investigation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I will update You asap.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank You for Your patience.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 15:24:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/revit-architecture-forum/ifc-option-quot-export-links-as-separate-models-quot-causes/m-p/9493334#M149285</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rafal.Gaweda</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-05-05T15:24:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

