<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Segmented Point Cloud? in ReCap Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/recap-forum/segmented-point-cloud/m-p/5685028#M22134</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Does it make a difference what files are used to create the .rcs files?&amp;nbsp; When using Kubit, we typically created an .e57 file that we indexed to a .pcg file.&amp;nbsp; In our tests with ReCap we were indexing the same .e57 files.&amp;nbsp; As our scan data is captured and registered with FARO Scene, should we be indexing&amp;nbsp;a .fws, or the&amp;nbsp;.lsproj files?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2015 12:23:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jason__M</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-06-19T12:23:37Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

