topic Re: power mill is best in PowerMill Forum

power mill is best

powercam.ir — Thu, 27 Sep 2018 21:41:22 GMT

Hi
I have a question about you. I do not know if you're just trying to answer questions or use the ideas to improve the Power Mill software and address its problems and needs.

Re: power mill is best

kamalrajcv — Fri, 28 Sep 2018 11:20:13 GMT

Hi @powercam.ir

Welcome to Autodesk community.

We don't just answer the queries posted over the forum.
If an issue/idea needs the attention of the development team, we report it to the development team.
The development team then works towards solving the issue or developing new features, thereby continually improving the software.

Re: power mill is best

powercam.ir — Fri, 28 Sep 2018 13:14:37 GMT

excellent. So you're in touch with people who upgrade this very powerful software? If this is the case, if I have problems I think or ideas that I have, if appropriate, in the software update is considered?

Re: power mill is best

powercam.ir — Fri, 28 Sep 2018 13:49:10 GMT

As the first question and idea, I wanted to put rest machining in the blisk area clearance strategy.

Re: power mill is best

powercam.ir — Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:00:31 GMT

As the second question and idea, In some cases, I need to be able to choose the value of stepover in the move climb and coventional as variables. For example, in a climb mode of 0.5mm and I can set the value of 1 mm to the coventional .

This setting will be executed when you use the option any.

Re: power mill is best

powercam.ir — Sun, 30 Sep 2018 20:04:39 GMT

As the third demand and suggestion, PowerMill does not have a dedicated and professional strategy for rough work and 4axis rotary work. It is better to use the specialized strategy for roughing and finishing and profiles of rotary parts.

Re: power mill is best_3D strategy weaknesses

powercam.ir — Mon, 01 Oct 2018 16:29:06 GMT

Hello to all friends. I was informed that software problems and ideas were communicated to the software research and development department. If possible, consider further

1-It introduces a highly dependent block if it does not need it at all. Even the size and dimensions of the block affects Toolpath.

2-It works very poorly for multi-axis movements. Especially in rotating movements it is very inefficient

Of course, I know there's a solution to any problem, but I believe that if we know the problems we must completely eliminate it.

Re: power mill is best_Surface finishing strategy weaknesses

powercam.ir — Mon, 01 Oct 2018 16:49:57 GMT

1-The most important problem with this strategy is its inability to select multiple Surface. You must always have all the surface join or just choose the right level.

2-It has a very high functionality to create multi-axis toolpath.

3-Multiple cuts has no function.

4-The pattern direction capability is weak. The desired angles must be adjustable