<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CADWorx object enabler install in Design Review? in ObjectARX Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/objectarx-forum/cadworx-object-enabler-install-in-design-review/m-p/6325630#M10080</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I hope that was tongue in cheek&amp;nbsp; &lt;img id="smileyindifferent" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyindifferent" src="https://forums.autodesk.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-indifferent.png" alt="Smiley Indifferent" title="Smiley Indifferent" /&gt;&amp;nbsp; We have a long and successful track record with it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 18:24:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dgorsman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-05-13T18:24:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CADWorx object enabler install in Design Review?</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/objectarx-forum/cadworx-object-enabler-install-in-design-review/m-p/6321448#M10077</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I need to get a sales engineer set up with Design Review so that she can see, print, and mark-up ACAD 2015 files. Problem is that we also use CADWorx 2015.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do I install the same object enabler&amp;nbsp;in her Design Review install? It is needed to see the CADWorx generated solids instead of the wireframe.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TIA,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;John Petty&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RVS, Bryan, TX&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2016 19:58:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/objectarx-forum/cadworx-object-enabler-install-in-design-review/m-p/6321448#M10077</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-11T19:58:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CADWorx object enabler install in Design Review?</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/objectarx-forum/cadworx-object-enabler-install-in-design-review/m-p/6325417#M10078</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Design Review doesn't natively open DWG files; rather it does a save-as (with DWG TrueView, if I remember correctly) to a 3D DWF file in the temp folder and then opens that.&amp;nbsp; Since DR doesn't read DWG files it doesn't support the object enabler architecture, third-party or otherwise.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Design Review is also effectively obsolete software at this point - development was halted several years back.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'd recommend a different process: manually create the 3D DWF files using DWG TrueView (which *does* support object enablers).&amp;nbsp; These can be opened in Navisworks Freedom.&amp;nbsp; You might also consider using the full Navisworks "ecosystem" with users regularly publishing NWD files for use by others.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 16:23:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/objectarx-forum/cadworx-object-enabler-install-in-design-review/m-p/6325417#M10078</guid>
      <dc:creator>dgorsman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-13T16:23:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CADWorx object enabler install in Design Review?</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/objectarx-forum/cadworx-object-enabler-install-in-design-review/m-p/6325619#M10079</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks! I will do without the DR and just stick with TV. And CADWorx just plain sucks rotten eggs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Happy friday the 13th !&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 18:12:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/objectarx-forum/cadworx-object-enabler-install-in-design-review/m-p/6325619#M10079</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-13T18:12:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CADWorx object enabler install in Design Review?</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/objectarx-forum/cadworx-object-enabler-install-in-design-review/m-p/6325630#M10080</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I hope that was tongue in cheek&amp;nbsp; &lt;img id="smileyindifferent" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyindifferent" src="https://forums.autodesk.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-indifferent.png" alt="Smiley Indifferent" title="Smiley Indifferent" /&gt;&amp;nbsp; We have a long and successful track record with it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 18:24:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/objectarx-forum/cadworx-object-enabler-install-in-design-review/m-p/6325630#M10080</guid>
      <dc:creator>dgorsman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-13T18:24:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CADWorx object enabler install in Design Review?</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/objectarx-forum/cadworx-object-enabler-install-in-design-review/m-p/6328810#M10081</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No, not tongue-in-cheek. Just aggravation with our implementation, really. We only use it to get correct sized pipe/elbows/tees. That's probably only 5% of what CADWorx is capable of and some insist on sticking with 2010. But ...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We will be changing over to Solid Edge soon, so old habits will be left behind. Too bad we have to change to a PITA history-based software to get past old methods. I very much prefer direct-editing of the solids. But Solid Edge is adding more direct-editing "synchronous" capability all the time.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2016 17:52:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/objectarx-forum/cadworx-object-enabler-install-in-design-review/m-p/6328810#M10081</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-05-16T17:52:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

