<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Utility Classes for AutoCAD .NET in .NET Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/net-forum/utility-classes-for-autocad-net/m-p/2003510#M77712</link>
    <description>Thanks. The forum looks interesting.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Scott Huey</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:44:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-06-26T15:44:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Utility Classes for AutoCAD .NET</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/net-forum/utility-classes-for-autocad-net/m-p/2003508#M77710</link>
      <description>I dabble with programming as a hobby. Most of my stuff is in Java, and is open source. However, I'm starting to play around with C# and development of tools for AutoCAD using the .NET API. I'm currently working my way through the AutoCAD .Net labs. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I noticed that there seems to be a lot of opportunity to condense code into some utility or helper classes. For example, there is a lot of method calls that take place to create a new Layer in a drawing. I wonder if that code couldn't be encapsulated in a Layer utility class with a method named createLayer that could then be used from client code. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
These utility classes could be kept in a third party library and offered under an open source license. (This would be similar to tha Apache Jakarta Commons libraries for Java.)&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is there something similar to this already? I plan on writing some of these utility classes, and would be interested in contributing code under an open source license to such a library if it exists.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If one does not, perhaps we can set one up if there is enough interest.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Scott Huey</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:39:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/net-forum/utility-classes-for-autocad-net/m-p/2003508#M77710</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-25T19:39:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Utility Classes for AutoCAD .NET</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/net-forum/utility-classes-for-autocad-net/m-p/2003509#M77711</link>
      <description>You need to be hanging out at http://www.theswamp.org/&lt;BR /&gt;
check out the .net forum</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 08:14:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/net-forum/utility-classes-for-autocad-net/m-p/2003509#M77711</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-26T08:14:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Utility Classes for AutoCAD .NET</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/net-forum/utility-classes-for-autocad-net/m-p/2003510#M77712</link>
      <description>Thanks. The forum looks interesting.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Scott Huey</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 15:44:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/net-forum/utility-classes-for-autocad-net/m-p/2003510#M77712</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-06-26T15:44:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

