<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MSI GT610 running Mudbox 2012 in Mudbox Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/mudbox-forum/msi-gt610-running-mudbox-2012/m-p/5606083#M4616</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;A quick google shows that it performs worse (in benchmarks) than modern onboard intel GPU's (part of many intel CPU's), but there is no harm in trying it, if your old card was NVidia, then it should also run the same drivers and be mostly 'plug and play'. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The good news is, I have been able to get Mudbox working on low power Intel CPU's, I am not sure what kind of resolution you're working on, but it is possible and it didn't lagg for me, but I have only tested upto 500k&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 23:12:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>j.pedlingham.2011</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-04-23T23:12:26Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

