<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic How PIMsupports F+P+W analysis in Moldflow Insight Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-insight-forum/how-pimsupports-f-p-w-analysis/m-p/13685037#M9932</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;In powder injection molding, currently only F+P are analyzed normally. What modifications can be made in the backend of moldflow to support analysis of F+P+W?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Because ordinary warping supports inertia, PIM currently does not support inertia. We hope to see the impact of inertia on PIM analysis&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 06:32:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>allan_tu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-17T06:32:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How PIMsupports F+P+W analysis</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-insight-forum/how-pimsupports-f-p-w-analysis/m-p/13685037#M9932</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In powder injection molding, currently only F+P are analyzed normally. What modifications can be made in the backend of moldflow to support analysis of F+P+W?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Because ordinary warping supports inertia, PIM currently does not support inertia. We hope to see the impact of inertia on PIM analysis&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2025 06:32:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-insight-forum/how-pimsupports-f-p-w-analysis/m-p/13685037#M9932</guid>
      <dc:creator>allan_tu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-17T06:32:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>回复： How PIMsupports F+P+W analysis</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-insight-forum/how-pimsupports-f-p-w-analysis/m-p/13707120#M9974</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/666363"&gt;@franco.costa&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How to implement warpage analysis in PIM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2025 07:04:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-insight-forum/how-pimsupports-f-p-w-analysis/m-p/13707120#M9974</guid>
      <dc:creator>allan_tu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-02T07:04:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How PIMsupports F+P+W analysis</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-insight-forum/how-pimsupports-f-p-w-analysis/m-p/13713111#M9984</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3514821"&gt;@allan_tu&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PIM analyses do support Inertia. The option is in the Advanced Solver Parameters setting dialog, just as it is for normal Thermoplastic Injection Molding.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The unique result of a PIM analysis is the prediction of the powder concentration - but this ultimately has no impact in the simualtion on modifying the viscosity, PVT or material properties, so you will get the same warp deflection prediction running the analysis as a normal Thermoplastic Injection Molding analysis Fill+Pack+Warp analysis as you would if you were able to trick the PIM processs type to also run a warp analysis sequence.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2025 02:32:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-insight-forum/how-pimsupports-f-p-w-analysis/m-p/13713111#M9984</guid>
      <dc:creator>franco.costa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-07T02:32:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

