<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Dual domain in tutorial versus software in Moldflow Adviser Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-adviser-forum/dual-domain-in-tutorial-versus-software/m-p/13100034#M41</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you again&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/7215289"&gt;@vgmarian&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/542604"&gt;@raalteh&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Are you aware of this issue?&amp;nbsp; Please let me know if I should create a support case or JIRA ticket.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Mason&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 11:04:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mason.myers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-10-22T11:04:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Dual domain in tutorial versus software</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-adviser-forum/dual-domain-in-tutorial-versus-software/m-p/13092833#M37</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I Moldflow adviser 2024, in some tutorials (fill analysis quick start tutorial and others) it says to choose 2D analysis when importing the part, however the software says the part is suited for 3D analysis. In older versions of Moldflow which I had the software said the part is suited for 2D like in the tutorial. Where is the problem?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 07:52:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-adviser-forum/dual-domain-in-tutorial-versus-software/m-p/13092833#M37</guid>
      <dc:creator>vgmarian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-18T07:52:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual domain in tutorial versus software</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-adviser-forum/dual-domain-in-tutorial-versus-software/m-p/13096816#M38</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/7215289"&gt;@vgmarian&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you refer to information such as:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://help.autodesk.com/view/MFAA/2025/ENU/?guid=MFLO_QUICKSTART_FILL_TUTORIAL_CREATE_A_PROJECT_CPT" target="_blank"&gt;Moldflow Adviser Help | Quickstart Fill tutorial: Create a project | Autodesk&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Generally speaking, this should have been reviewed before a release that tutorial and software agree.&lt;BR /&gt;Probably some tweaking in software, or unexpected defect occurred.&lt;BR /&gt;Believe Autodesk tech support need to review this.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4009450"&gt;@mason.myers&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mason, could you have a look at this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Berndt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 04:48:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-adviser-forum/dual-domain-in-tutorial-versus-software/m-p/13096816#M38</guid>
      <dc:creator>bernor_mf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-21T04:48:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual domain in tutorial versus software</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-adviser-forum/dual-domain-in-tutorial-versus-software/m-p/13098568#M39</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/7215289"&gt;@vgmarian&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am not sure the last time these were updated.&amp;nbsp; As&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/3208057"&gt;@bernor_mf&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; there could be minor changes in version to version.&amp;nbsp; I run most of my Adviser parts in 3D anyways.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Mason&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 19:40:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-adviser-forum/dual-domain-in-tutorial-versus-software/m-p/13098568#M39</guid>
      <dc:creator>mason.myers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-21T19:40:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual domain in tutorial versus software</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-adviser-forum/dual-domain-in-tutorial-versus-software/m-p/13099081#M40</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I imported a simple sheet of 1 mm thickness and 110 mm side. The software advises 3D simulation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 02:49:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-adviser-forum/dual-domain-in-tutorial-versus-software/m-p/13099081#M40</guid>
      <dc:creator>vgmarian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-22T02:49:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual domain in tutorial versus software</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-adviser-forum/dual-domain-in-tutorial-versus-software/m-p/13100034#M41</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you again&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/7215289"&gt;@vgmarian&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/542604"&gt;@raalteh&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;Are you aware of this issue?&amp;nbsp; Please let me know if I should create a support case or JIRA ticket.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Mason&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 11:04:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-adviser-forum/dual-domain-in-tutorial-versus-software/m-p/13100034#M41</guid>
      <dc:creator>mason.myers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-22T11:04:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual domain in tutorial versus software</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-adviser-forum/dual-domain-in-tutorial-versus-software/m-p/13100439#M42</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4009450"&gt;@mason.myers&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;I don't think we made intentional changes here. This could be a bug ...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2024 13:44:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-adviser-forum/dual-domain-in-tutorial-versus-software/m-p/13100439#M42</guid>
      <dc:creator>raalteh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-22T13:44:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual domain in tutorial versus software</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-adviser-forum/dual-domain-in-tutorial-versus-software/m-p/13132914#M43</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/542604"&gt;@raalteh&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4009450"&gt;@mason.myers&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;just wanted to follow up if you could repeat this, and found the issue?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Berndt&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 05:25:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-adviser-forum/dual-domain-in-tutorial-versus-software/m-p/13132914#M43</guid>
      <dc:creator>bernor_mf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-06T05:25:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual domain in tutorial versus software</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-adviser-forum/dual-domain-in-tutorial-versus-software/m-p/13133000#M44</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems the software recommends simulations on 3D on tutorial parts that before were recommended as dual domain. However, I imported a plastic cup with perfectly constant wall and the software recommended 2D. So not all parts are recommended as 3D. It seems a shift more on 3D side. However the tutorials should also be adapted.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 06:40:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-adviser-forum/dual-domain-in-tutorial-versus-software/m-p/13133000#M44</guid>
      <dc:creator>vgmarian</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-06T06:40:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual domain in tutorial versus software</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-adviser-forum/dual-domain-in-tutorial-versus-software/m-p/13133150#M45</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/7215289"&gt;@vgmarian&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for sharing your findings.&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":smiling_face_with_smiling_eyes:"&gt;😊&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Berndt&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 08:36:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/moldflow-adviser-forum/dual-domain-in-tutorial-versus-software/m-p/13133150#M45</guid>
      <dc:creator>bernor_mf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-11-06T08:36:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

