<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 2D Contour, Multiple Depths, in Machining Discussions Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/machining-discussions-forum/2d-contour-multiple-depths/m-p/8415519#M6376</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Edit2: (time was expired :D)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But why do you use ramping with open contours? IMO an increased tool wear. In this cases you can do it like adaptive. Just multiple stepdowns but with roughing passes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When you want the 20° in an open contour how should be the tool path?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Ramp starts anywhere and end by the beginning of your contour and then make one of the "multiple depths" complete to the end of your contour. Now the ramp begins and end anywhere of your contour? Then cut to the beginning of the contour and retract or cut double the same toolpath backwards for the rest (material under the ramp). I don't know how to solve it efficient.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:46:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>FTKnur</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-11-21T07:46:44Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

