<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 2D Contour, Multiple Depths, in Machining Discussions Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/machining-discussions-forum/2d-contour-multiple-depths/m-p/8415455#M6375</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;@Anonymous,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;can you attach your file?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have now tried a little bit but don't can get your result.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have made many operations with other parameters but my ramp/multiple depth do exactly that what I want and not change the ramp from first to the other stepdowns.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Edit:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Okay now I see what's the problem. That is just when you have open contours. I see there what's the problem:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The start point of the first stepdown is calculated by the angle of ramp down and the others would (if not set to 9999) choose the other maximum stepdown for the complete contour...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But why do you use ramping with open contours? IMO an increased tool wear. In this cases you can do it like adaptive. Just multiple stepdowns but with roughing passes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It's realy confusing tool path with ramp and multiple depths on open contours... there you can't change the ramp stepdown.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 07:35:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>FTKnur</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-11-21T07:35:18Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

