<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is there a better way? in Machining Discussions Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/machining-discussions-forum/is-there-a-better-way/m-p/6083961#M5937</link>
    <description>While not exactly the same N.Stein... your solution did help give me a way to clean up some of my tool paths on an object I was working on in Inventor.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Where I was previously doing something like 3 different tool paths (with different parameters throughout), I now have 1 clean tool path that accomplishes the same thing by using a modified copy of the original solid.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:34:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mfeathers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-07-28T15:34:14Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

