<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is there a better way? in Machining Discussions Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/machining-discussions-forum/is-there-a-better-way/m-p/6083957#M5933</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TH&gt;Laurens-3DTechDraw  wrote:&lt;/TH&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Since the fragment extension distance doesn't work there is no other way indeed.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Also something funny with the steep area's when you select another part like I did in the attached part.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thinking of getting off of SW or something?&amp;nbsp; &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2015 16:41:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steinwerks</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-07-27T16:41:14Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

