<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Best way to program with a double chamfer mill? in Machining Discussions Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/machining-discussions-forum/best-way-to-program-with-a-double-chamfer-mill/m-p/6091186#M5265</link>
    <description>So the problem is trying to use a chamfer tool with a reduced neck which looks exactly like the real tool is the problem?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;So, back to the original question, what is the cleanest way to program an undercut chamfer?</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 19:16:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CGPM</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-09-07T19:16:29Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

