<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Best way to program with a double chamfer mill? in Machining Discussions Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/machining-discussions-forum/best-way-to-program-with-a-double-chamfer-mill/m-p/6091182#M5261</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TH&gt;Laurens-3DTechDraw  wrote:&lt;/TH&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;What I mean here is that with the new library you should get options to set such a tool up without having to make a form tool. But I don't think we get a undercut chamfer option in the 2D Contour.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I see what you mean. One would think that with the correct tool definition it would see where the edge is and either use the "Chamfer" checkbox appropriately or offer a back chamfer box instead.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;One can hope, yes?</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 15:45:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steinwerks</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-09-07T15:45:24Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

