<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Best way to program with a double chamfer mill? in Machining Discussions Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/machining-discussions-forum/best-way-to-program-with-a-double-chamfer-mill/m-p/6091180#M5259</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TH&gt;Laurens-3DTechDraw  wrote:&lt;/TH&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Another thing that should be solved by the new library, that doesn't mean you'll get options to use it though.&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You'll have to expound a bit, I don't think I understand.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;But why I was asking if he had a tool that could chamfer both(Top&amp;amp;Bottom) would make programming a lot easier.&lt;BR /&gt;But the way you show here is how I would normally do it. &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Fair enough. I figured he was talking about an off-the-shelf solution though. I'm stuck in the same world, after all.&amp;nbsp; :-X</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2015 05:48:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steinwerks</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-09-07T05:48:15Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

