<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Best way to program with a double chamfer mill? in Machining Discussions Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/machining-discussions-forum/best-way-to-program-with-a-double-chamfer-mill/m-p/6091178#M5257</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TH&gt;CGPM  wrote:&lt;/TH&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Stein has it right, but this is for one off/ short run stuff so no custom tools since it is always different.&amp;nbsp; I just programmed a t-slot cut with a keyseat cutter so that would kind of work, but so would hand coding.&amp;nbsp; Just wondering what the cleanest way to program this would be?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;No, I mean you should model the cutter you're using as HSM* doesn't have a provision for back chamfer cutters. I did it just now for shiggles (using the Maritool pictured above - .484" diameter with .3125 shank).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You have to change your "stock to leave" numbers a bit to get the chamfer you want, but once you have it where you like it, just create a pattern and repeat as desired.</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2015 21:43:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Steinwerks</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-09-06T21:43:39Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

