<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Enhancement Request: Round Corners in Machining Discussions Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/machining-discussions-forum/enhancement-request-round-corners/m-p/6094183#M4893</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TH&gt;lenny bucholz  wrote:&lt;/TH&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;as Greg always says "KISS".&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Well if we truly want it KISS which can be explained in two ways: &lt;BR /&gt;"Simplicity is a prerequisite for reliability"&lt;BR /&gt;"Systems perform best when they have simple designs rather than complex ones."&lt;BR /&gt;We should stick to the geometry selected will be cut. It's simple, it's rocksolid and has not multiple ways to the same thing. So a simple design versus one that has many button, bells and whistles.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;And we don't do production either and that's probably the scenario you most want the model to represent what the final product looks like.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2015 15:46:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Laurens-3DTechDraw</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-09-29T15:46:43Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

