<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Drilling Aluminum - full or partial retract in Machining Discussions Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/machining-discussions-forum/drilling-aluminum-full-or-partial-retract/m-p/6098753#M4469</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TH&gt;N. Stein  wrote:&lt;/TH&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I run 2% of drill diameter per revolution for feed. Usually quite safe in aluminum and mild steels. Feed harder in plastics. No experience with the mister, but with flood I will chip break peck (high speed peck, whatever you want to call it) through about an inch without thinking about it if my drill is over .200". I don't see why you wouldn't get away with it though. If you're worried, try it on a piece of scrap first.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My default is 200SFM for HSS uncoated drills, so for your .204" I would run 3745 RPM @ 15.28 IPM.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Your chipload appears to be .0027/flute. Should work but nearing 3% drill diameter that I run as a maximum.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sounds like he has got only mist cooling and no flood. But that might be wrong.&lt;BR /&gt;About feed and speed totally depends on your tool. I've got HSS drills where a 10mm drill can feed 0.35mm/rev and ones that can only handle 0.16 mm/rev so not really something one can judge if it's optimal.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2015 06:00:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Laurens-3DTechDraw</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-10-29T06:00:55Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

