<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Frame Generator Trim/Extend Issues in Inventor Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/frame-generator-trim-extend-issues/m-p/13337417#M4336</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hard to say without looking at it however, I would honestly skip the use of frame gen for this kind of workflow and build the members manually and use iLogic to control the trims, replace etc. Then either iLogic copy design or Vault copy design (ideally) for each new assembly. Copying folders and renaming with multiple projects is a bit messy imo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I feel you are going to have far more control over the final assembly doing it this way. Frame gen is great for getting something done fast, I don't think it's great for a customisable assembly that is re-used.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 23:40:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BDCollett</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-02-24T23:40:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Frame Generator Trim/Extend Issues</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/frame-generator-trim-extend-issues/m-p/13337396#M4335</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Hi all,&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;I'm encountering an issue with the &lt;STRONG&gt;trim/extend&lt;/STRONG&gt; feature in &lt;STRONG&gt;Inventor's Frame Generator&lt;/STRONG&gt;, and it happens sporadically, making it difficult to troubleshoot.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;My Workflow (Glazing Industry – Window Unit Fabrication)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Copy a template folder&lt;/STRONG&gt; – Contains a &lt;STRONG&gt;frame sketch.&lt;/STRONG&gt; (driven by an Excel sheet) and an &lt;STRONG&gt;assembly&lt;/STRONG&gt; with misc. items.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Adjust frame parameters&lt;/STRONG&gt; – Excel dictates window unit dimensions and updates the &lt;STRONG&gt;frame sketch&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Add necessary parts&lt;/STRONG&gt; – Using &lt;STRONG&gt;Frame Generator&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;placing&amp;nbsp;external parts.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Trim/Extend process&lt;/STRONG&gt; – I trim/extend parts to &lt;STRONG&gt;planes within the frame sketch itself&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;(never to faces of frame-generated parts, to avoid breaking constraints when swapping parts).&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Duplicate workflow for each window&lt;/STRONG&gt; – Copy the folder (including the .ipj file), rename it for the next window unit, and repeat.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;The Issue&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;The &lt;STRONG&gt;Pressure_Plate_Standard&lt;/STRONG&gt; part should be &lt;STRONG&gt;¼” shorter&lt;/STRONG&gt; than the &lt;STRONG&gt;Face_Cap_Standard&lt;/STRONG&gt; part.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Visually, the part looks correct—there are &lt;STRONG&gt;⅛” offsets&lt;/STRONG&gt; on both ends, and the &lt;STRONG&gt;Measure tool&lt;/STRONG&gt; confirms &lt;STRONG&gt;118.25”&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;However, the &lt;STRONG&gt;browser lists it as 96.25”&lt;/STRONG&gt;, and the &lt;STRONG&gt;BOM shows 118.5”&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Fix&lt;/STRONG&gt;: Deleting and redoing the trim/extends resolves it, but this isn't ideal as the issue is unpredictable.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Seeking Advice&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Has anyone else experienced this issue with Frame Generator? Any recommendations to &lt;STRONG&gt;prevent this from happening&lt;/STRONG&gt; or &lt;STRONG&gt;improve workflow stability&lt;/STRONG&gt;?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 23:24:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/frame-generator-trim-extend-issues/m-p/13337396#M4335</guid>
      <dc:creator>michael.meierZ27GS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-24T23:24:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Frame Generator Trim/Extend Issues</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/frame-generator-trim-extend-issues/m-p/13337417#M4336</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hard to say without looking at it however, I would honestly skip the use of frame gen for this kind of workflow and build the members manually and use iLogic to control the trims, replace etc. Then either iLogic copy design or Vault copy design (ideally) for each new assembly. Copying folders and renaming with multiple projects is a bit messy imo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I feel you are going to have far more control over the final assembly doing it this way. Frame gen is great for getting something done fast, I don't think it's great for a customisable assembly that is re-used.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2025 23:40:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/frame-generator-trim-extend-issues/m-p/13337417#M4336</guid>
      <dc:creator>BDCollett</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-24T23:40:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Frame Generator Trim/Extend Issues</title>
      <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/frame-generator-trim-extend-issues/m-p/13339208#M4337</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would agree that a different workflow would be ideal, but this is the current state we're in unfortunately and to set time aside to rebuild a new system isn't available at the moment.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 18:45:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/frame-generator-trim-extend-issues/m-p/13339208#M4337</guid>
      <dc:creator>michael.meierZ27GS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-02-25T18:45:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

