<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: flexible nightmare in Inventor Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/flexible-nightmare/m-p/5943015#M385495</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;kmeldfreyssinet schrieb:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regarding&amp;nbsp;constraints to origin planes and axis in sub assemblies.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You propose not to do that. In such case components move freely inside sub-assembly. therefore their position in their&amp;nbsp;parent assembly is not defined.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I didn't let them move freely around, but I grounded one or more base components. That seems to be better for flexibility.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 08:04:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>WHolzwarth</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-12-09T08:04:05Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

