<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: creating a chain link wire mesh in Inventor Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/creating-a-chain-link-wire-mesh/m-p/5556888#M382070</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;@Anonymous wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You could design it as a surface?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sure, but why? &amp;nbsp;Surfaces don't take much less resource than a solid, and you can't automagically get your mass or anything else from them.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you have the resources available, do it as a solid. &amp;nbsp;If you don't, do it as a texture. &amp;nbsp;(Actually, you should probably just do it as a texture anyway, and set your material to have the appropriate density for a square / linear foot or meter or whatever of the material you're using.)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 14:34:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>LT.Rusty</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-03-25T14:34:58Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

