<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Moving Work Planes (size and position, not dimension) in Inventor Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/moving-work-planes-size-and-position-not-dimension/m-p/5590093#M379676</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I just did a search for a forum thread in which &lt;a href="https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/486618"&gt;@johnsonshiue&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;(if I recall correctly) explained in some detail how assembly work features are different from part work features, but I couldn't find it. &amp;nbsp;My recollection is that assembly work features behave as components, constrained to one another and to components in the same way that components are constrained to each other. &amp;nbsp;I believe that post also addressed the inability to move assembly work plane representations (the outlines) off center. &amp;nbsp;Perhaps Johnson or someone else with that level of knowledge would care to jump in with a short dissertation on the subject?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Sam B&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Inventor Professional 2015 SP1 Update 3&lt;BR /&gt;Windows 7 Enterprise 64-bit, SP1&lt;BR /&gt;HP EliteBook 8770w; 8 GB RAM; Core™ i7-3720QM 2.60 GHz; Quadro K4000M&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 22:53:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SBix26</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-04-13T22:53:45Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

