<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Best PC choice for inventor and what to focus my money on? in Inventor Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/best-pc-choice-for-inventor-and-what-to-focus-my-money-on/m-p/5595994#M379660</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Has Inventor really become that much more demanding on PCs over the decades? It seems like not too long ago I was running it on a 600MHz machine with a state-of-the-90's gaming card. I'd bet that if you turn off textures/reflections/shadows etc. then any machine on the market today would run it just fine.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seriously tho, for&amp;nbsp;the work described by the OP, would you really&amp;nbsp;be able to tell those machines apart?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Excuse the not very helpful post.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jon C.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 22:03:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Cnoj</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-04-16T22:03:23Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

