<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Computer/System Requirements to run a large inventor assembly &amp;gt;10,000 par in Inventor Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/computer-system-requirements-to-run-a-large-inventor-assembly-gt/m-p/5593915#M379316</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Cody,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;In my experience better computers are always worth it! ... To what extent, I cannot answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just some reccommendations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When working with large assemblies it is always best to work within your local machine whenever possible, work in a single root directory rathe than multiple locations, create level of detail representations, and utilize express mode as much as possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Another big memory comsumption is usually general workflow. The more efficient the part modeling is, the smaller the memory load from the assembly, although I understand that is a difficult task when using large assemblies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, removing textures, lighting, shadows, edges, and reflections will help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Which of these takes priority over the rest? I'm not sure, but In my case If I were working with large assemblies, I would put all of them to practice as much as I could.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe another poster can help us realize which is the most important for memory reduction.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 20:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>wrw0007</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-04-15T20:53:00Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

