<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Horizontal and Vertical Constraints Not Consistent with View Block Text in Inventor Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/horizontal-and-vertical-constraints-not-consistent-with-view/m-p/6203457#M377755</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Eh, it's not a big deal for me anymore. I convinced my employer to make the switch from Inventor to Solidworks, and we are (I am!) much happier. It's bugs/features like this that drive me nuts working with Inventor. There's a host of other nit-picky issues that drove the switch, but in general Solidworks is much easier to use. I say this having used Inventor in undergrad, Solidworks in grad school, Inventor for about 2 years professionally, and now Solidworks about 6 months professionally.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In general, the design philosphy for Inventor seems to be, "Why does it matter if X does Y?" while Solidworks seems to be, "&lt;EM&gt;Should&lt;/EM&gt; X do Y?"&amp;nbsp;I'm the lone mechanical engineer in a company of software engineers, and they all seem to have a similar mindset - "Why would I re-write this interface? This is the way it is. &lt;STRONG&gt;It's a training issue and the customer just needs to learn this is the way it is.&lt;/STRONG&gt;" I also give everyone I work with a hard time about this. It doesn't matter what the easiest way to code/display/etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'll quote "Autodesk Expert Elite" LT Rusty:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; If you redefine FRONT on the view cube to TOP instead, then magically all the horizontal and vertical stuff inside Inventor makes sense and works the way you'd expect it to.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; So, in short, I'd say that it's the View Cube that's inconsistent with, oh, everything else. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; That said, it's probably not going to change, so ...&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's not this issue that drove me to switch, it's just that this issue is the epitome of what's wrong with Inventor.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2016 21:34:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-03-07T21:34:25Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

