<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Inventor assemblies, groups, promoting/demoting etc... in Inventor Forum</title>
    <link>https://forums.autodesk.com/t5/inventor-forum/inventor-assemblies-groups-promoting-demoting-etc/m-p/5697535#M370209</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;phantom as said above or promote them into the assembly as you stated..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;promote will be better assuming these parts will get constrained in all different combinations depending on the top level assembly.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 12:35:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mcgyvr</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-06-29T12:35:37Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
</rss>

